期刊文献+

不同前处理方法对原子荧光法测定食品中总砷结果的影响 被引量:5

Study on impact of different pretreatment methods on total arsenic analysis results by atomic fluorescence spectrometry in food specimens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 了解不同前处理方法对原子荧光法测定食品中总砷结果的影响.方法 对氢化物-原子荧光法测定食品中总砷的前处理方法进行研究,探讨干法灰化法、湿法消解法、微波消解法、硝酸预处理-干灰化法4种前处理方法对原子荧光法测定食品中总砷测定结果的影响.结果 在最佳条件下,分析方法的RSD为1.2%~3.8%(n=11),线性范围为0~150μg/L,相关系数r=0.999 9;在取样量为2.0g时,方法的检出限为0.004 7 mg/kg.结论 硝酸预处理-干灰化法适用于食品特别是富含有机砷的食品中总砷的测定,传统干灰化法、微波消解和湿消解法适用于样品中砷存在形式比较简单的食品样品. Objective To study the influence of different pretreatment methods on total arsenic analysis results by hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry in food specimens. Methods Dry ashing method,wet digestion, microwave digestion and nitric acid-dry ashing method were used for pretreatments of food specimens, the total arsenic in specimens were analyzed by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Results were compared to evaluate the impact of different pretreatment methods. Results Under optimized condition, the relative standard deviation of analytical methods were l. 20%- 3.80% (n= 11). The linear range was 0-150 μg/L ,r=0. 999 9. The detection limit was 0. 004 7 mg/kg in 2 g of food specimen. Conclusion nitric acid-dry ashing method was a suitable pretreatment method for determination of total arsenic in food specimens,especially food rich in organic arsenic.
作者 姜新 刘运明
出处 《江苏预防医学》 CAS 2015年第5期45-47,共3页 Jiangsu Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 氢化物原子荧光法 总砷 前处理方法 食品 Hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry Total arsenic Pretreatment method Food
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献52

共引文献280

同被引文献52

  • 1方艳玲,方艳敏,张波.高氯酸在样品消解中的应用[J].中国热带医学,2005,5(9):1913-1913. 被引量:12
  • 2吴抒怀,蔡怡鹃.钯-抗坏血酸基体改进剂平台石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定贻贝标样中的砷[J].光谱实验室,1996,13(5):21-25. 被引量:3
  • 3食品中污染物限量:GB2762--2012fS].北京:中国质检出版社,2012.
  • 4食品中总砷及无机砷的测定:GB/7i5009.1l--2003[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
  • 5HIRAYAMA T, SAKAGAMI Y, NOHARA M, et al. Wet digestion with nickel ion and graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrophotometry for the determina- tion of total arsenic in food samples [J]. Bunseki Ka- gaku, 1981,30(5 ) : 278-281.
  • 6OKUBO N, KAWBATA N, KOSHIDA K, et al. D etermination of total arsenic absorption spectrophotometry in food samples by atomic- with a graphite-furnace af-ter nickel ion added wet digestion [J]. Eisei Kagaku- japanese Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1985,1 (4) : 274-277.
  • 7CHEN S S, CHENG C C, CHOU S S. Determination of arsenic in edible oils by direct graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis ,2003,11 (3) :214-219.
  • 8ZHURAVLEV A, ZACHARIA A, GUBOTAREV A, et al. Direct atomic absorption spectrometry determination of arsenic, cadmium, copper, manganese, lead and zinc in vegetable oil and fat samples with graphite filter furnace atomizer[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2015 (38) : 62-68.
  • 9BORO $ OVA Validation and D, MOCAK J, BEINROHR E, et al. quality assurance of arsenic determina- tion in urine by GFAAS after toluene extraction[J]. Pol- ish J. Environ Stud, 2002,11(6) :617-623.
  • 10杨雪娇,黄伟,林涛,叶勇明,黄雪琳.微波消解-塞曼石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定食品中的总砷[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2008,20(1):39-41. 被引量:9

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部