唐代铜州与容州治所之考析

An Examination of the Seats of Local Government of Tongzhou and Rongzhou in Tang Dynasty

新旧"唐书"记述桂东南铜州与容州的治所相互抵牾,尔后方志便有着种种不同的解读。本文围绕这些问题,从碑刻、史书与考古诸方面进行分析,厘清北流与容县古今分域和铜州被废弃,进而又从地理形势去深入考究容州治所一直没有迁移过的战略意义,否定了国史"迁徙说",同时澄清了其它有关的问题,还原历史的本来面目。

The seats of local government of Tongzhou and Rongzhou recorded in the new ＂Tang Book＂ and the old one are contradictory. Then, local chronicles have different interpretation. To solve this problem, this paper analyzes the strategic significance of not transferring the Rongzhou seat from the perspective of inscription, historical records and archaeology, clarifying the boundary of Beiliu and Rong, denying the ＂transference saying＂ , clarifying other relative questions and restore the true colors of history.