期刊文献+

吊装设备振动冲击下的铝合金车体C型槽疲劳强度分析 被引量:2

Fatigue Strength Analysis of C Groove Structure of A-Alloy Train Body under Vibration Load of Suspension Equipment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对吊装设备振动冲击下的车体承载结构疲劳损伤问题,采用有限元法对某型动车组车顶净水箱吊装设备振动冲击下的车体C型槽疲劳强度进行仿真分析.根据EN 12663标准确定净水箱的工作载荷工况,计算出吊装组件连接螺栓承载力,作为C型槽疲劳强度计算载荷.假定各载荷工况出现频率相同的情况下,构造了工作载荷历程.采用有限元法分析了C型槽在工作载荷下的静强度与疲劳强度.计算结果表明:振动冲击下,C型槽最大值应力值为13.8 MPa,远小于材料的屈服强度,表明在正常运行工况下C型槽不会出现塑性破坏;在1.0×107设计寿命下,结构最小安全系数为13.625,表明在指定的设计寿命内C型槽不会发生疲劳破坏. For researching the fatigue characteristics of the loading location of train body under vibration load of suspension equipments,the fatigue strength of train body C groove structure of Electric Multiple Units under vibration load of water tank was computed by Finite Element Method. The work loads of water tank were defined according to EN 12663 standard. The loads of joint bolts of suspension components were calculated and seen as work load of C groove structure. The load time histories were constructed considering the same appearing frequency of the work loads. The siatic and fatigue trengths of C groove structure under work loading were analyzed by Finite Element Method. The results show that the maximum stress of the C groove structure is 13.8 MPa under vibration load. It is lower than the yield stress of train body material,so it will not be damaged plastically. The minimunl factor of strength is 13. 625 when the design life is 1.0× 10^7cycles,which means that the fatigue damage behavior will not happen on C groove structure.
出处 《大连交通大学学报》 CAS 2015年第5期26-29,共4页 Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University
基金 辽宁省教育厅高等学校科研计划资助项目(L2013181) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2013M5009)
关键词 铝合金车体 C型 疲劳分析 仿真 : A-alloy train body C-slot fatigue analysis simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1牵引动力国家重点实验室.时速400公里高速检测车车体与车下设备耦合振动分析[R].成都:西南交通大学,2011.
  • 2SCHUPP G, NETTER H, MAUER L, et al. Multiix)dySystem Simulation of Railway Vehicles with SIMPACK[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement, 1999, 31 :101-118.
  • 3王东屏,何正凯,李明高,兆文忠.动车组气动阻力降阻优化数值研究[J].铁道学报,2011,33(10):15-18. 被引量:20
  • 4DIEDRICHS B. Aerodynamic Calculations of CrosswinciStability of a High-Speed Train Using Control Volumes ofArbitrary Polyhedral Shape [ J ] . Bluff Bodies Aerodynam-ics &Applieations,2008,6 :20-24.
  • 5康洪军,曾京,张卫华,缪炳荣,吴会超.高速综合检测列车车体与车下设备耦合振动分析[J].北京交通大学学报,2011,35(6):62-66. 被引量:23

二级参考文献13

  • 1田红旗.中国列车空气动力学研究进展[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1):1-9. 被引量:186
  • 2缪炳荣,张卫华,肖守讷,金鼎昌,贺建清.基于多体动力学和有限元法的车体结构疲劳寿命仿真[J].铁道学报,2007,29(4):38-42. 被引量:23
  • 3佚名.CRH3动车组风洞试验总结报告[R].唐山:唐山轨道客车有限责任公司,2009.
  • 4牵引动力国家重点实验室.时速400公里高速检测车车体与车下没备耦合振动分析[R].成都:西南交通大学,2011.
  • 5Stefan D. Helmuth N, Deif S. Fatigue life prediction of a railway bogie under dynamic loads through simulation[J ]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1998,29(3): 385 -402.
  • 6Sridhar Srikantan, Shekar Yerrapalli, Hamid Keshtkar. Durability design process for truck body structures[J ]. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2000, 23 ( 1/2) : 95 108.
  • 7Medepalli S, Rao R. Prediction of roadloads for fatigue design, a sensitivity study[J ]. International Journal of Vehb cle Design,2000,23( 1/2) : 161 - 175.
  • 8Kim H S, Yim H J, Kim C B. Computational durability prediction of body structure in propotype vehiele[J ]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2002, 23 ( 1 ) : 129 136.
  • 9Sung I S,Choon P, Kin K H, et al. Fatigue strength evaluation of aluminum carbody of urban transit unit by large scale dynamic load test [J]. JSME international journal, 2005,48(1): 27- 34.
  • 10European Committee for Standardization. En12663 2000, Railway Application Structural Requirements of Railway Vehicle Bodies[ S]. London: British Standard Institution, 2000.

共引文献39

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部