阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征行多导睡眠检测仪监测的舒适护理干预效果观察

The effect of comfort nursing intervention for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome by multi-sleep monitoring

目的观察阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征行多导睡眠检测仪监测的舒适护理干预效果。方法选择2011年1月~2014年1月在我院治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者60例,随机分为对照组30例和干预组30例,对照组给予常规对症护理,干预组于监测前、监测中及监测后行舒适护理干预,比较两组的焦虑心理SAS评分、两组监测成功率及监测失败原因、两组护理工作满意度。结果监测结束后,干预组与对照组SAS评分分别较入院时显著降低,且干预组的SAS评分[（35.49±6.22）分]显著低于对照组（41.35±7.39）分,组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。干预组监测成功28例,监测失败2例,干预组监测成功率达93.3%（28/30）。对照组监测成功26例,监测失败4例,干预组监测成功率达86.7%（26/30）,两组监测成功率比较,差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。干预组的护理满意度达96.7%,显著高于对照组的护理满意度70.0%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征行多导睡眠检测仪监测的过程中实施舒适护理干预,可以缓解患者的焦虑心理、提高监测成功率及护理满意度。

To observe the effect of comfort nursing intervention for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syn-drome by multi-sleep monitoring. Methods From January 2011 to January 2014 in our hospital,60 cases of patients with obstructive sleep apnea suspended low ventilation syndrome were randomly divided into the control group （n=30） and the intervention group（n=30）, the control group was given routine symptomatic care, the intervention group was per-formed on the comfortable nursing intervention,the anxiety scores of SAS,monitoring success rate and monitoring failure reason, nursing work satisfaction were compared between two groups. Results After monitoring, the scores of SAS in the intervention group and control group were significantly decreased and SAS scores in the intervention group were （35.49＋ 6.22） ,were significantly lower than that of the control group （41.35~7.39）, the differences were statistically significant between two groups （P〈0.05）. 28 cases made a success of monitoring in the intervention group 2 cases were failure, the success rate of the intervention group was 93.3% （28/30）. 26 cases made a success in the control group, 4 cases were failure, the monitoring success rate of control group reached 86.7%（26/30）, there were statistically significant dif- ferences between two groups （P〈0.05）. The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 96.7%,was significantly higher than the control group＇s nursing satisfaction 70%, the difference was statistically significant between two groups （P〈0.05）. 28 cases made a success of monitoring in the intervention group, 2 cases were failure,the success rate of the intervention group was 93.3%（28/30）. 26 cases made a success in the control group, 4 cases were failure, the monitoring success rate of control group reached 86.7% （26/30）, there were statistically significant differences between two groups （P〈0.05）. The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 96.7%, was significantly higher than the control group＇s nursing satisfaction 70%, the difference was statistically significant between two groups （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Comfortable nursing intervention for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome by multichannel sleep monitoring instrument monitoring can alleviate the anxiety of patients, improve the success rate of monitoring and nursing satisfaction.