期刊文献+

《权利法案》的程序法意义 被引量:1

The Significance of Bill of Rights in Procedural Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《权利法案》的程序法条款是将公民权利写进宪法的一种独特立宪方式,表明将公民权利宣言载入宪法具有道德必要性与技术可行性。权利价值是宪法的正当性泉源,是现代政治的道德基础与根本出发点,作为立国之基的宪法首先是一个道德宣言。宪法程序是道德权利明确化、实在化的基本形式。运用程序技术的术语书写与阐释抽象权利,注重对人身权与财产权的司法程序保障,是英国普通法的传统。《权利法案》的意义,不仅在于继承了普通法人权司法程序保障的传统,还在于将这种司法程序保障提升到宪法的高度,使得以陪审制为代表的普通法程序跻身成为具有最高权威性的宪法程序。 The enactment of provisions of procedural law in Bill of Rights is a unique way of constitution - making, for its inclu- sion of civil rights in the constitution. It is morally necessary and technically feasible to enshrine the declaration of the rights of citizens in the constitution, as human rights are the source of the legitimacy of constitution and the moral foundation of modern politics, and the constitution, as the foundation of state, is firstly a moral declaration. Therefore, the constitutional procedure is the basic form in which the moral rights could get explication and actualization. Besides, it is the tradition of British common law to articulate abstract rights in procedural terminology, and to pay attention to protecting personal rights and property rights through judicial procedures. In conclusion, the meaning of Bill of Rights is not only to inherit the tradition of protecting human rights judicial procedures, but also to raise such procedures protection to constitutional height, which makes the common law pro- cedures, represented by jury system, elevate to supreme constitutional procedures.
作者 汪栋
出处 《学术探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第10期52-59,共8页 Academic Exploration
基金 国家社科基金项目(10BFX054)
关键词 权利法案 道德权利 普通法 陪审制 程序法 Bill of Rights moral rights common law jury system procedural law
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1汉密尔顿.联邦党人文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980..
  • 2汪栋,董和平.论公民权利的宪法设置——以《权利法案》为例[J].河北法学,2004,22(12):15-19. 被引量:3
  • 3Justice William O. Douglas's Comment in Joint Anti - Fascist Refugee Comm. v. Mcgrath, see United States Supreme Court Re- ports (95 Law. Ed. Oct. 1950 Term),The Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company, 1951.
  • 4罗纳德·德沃金.自由的法-对美国宪法的道德解读[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
  • 5麦迪逊.辩论:美国制宪会议记录(下)[M].尹宣,译.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2003.
  • 6托克维尔.论美国的民主(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.270.
  • 7迈克尔·奥克肖特.政治中的理性主义[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2004.
  • 8Frank M. Coleman. Hobbes and America: Exploring the consti- tutional foundations [M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.

二级参考文献9

  • 1吕尚敏.论宪法规定中的程序性条款[J].江苏社会科学,1999(2):40-45. 被引量:11
  • 2哈耶克.自由秩序原理[M].北京:三联书店,1997..
  • 3汉密尔顿.联邦党人文集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980..
  • 4罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.61-62.
  • 5列宁全集·第12卷[M].人民出版社,1959.50.
  • 6李春燕.论宪法修改[A].胡建淼宪法学十论[M].46.
  • 7伯纳德·施瓦茨王军,等译.美国法律史[M].中国政法大学出版社,1990.55.
  • 8罗纳德·德沃金.刘丽君译.自由的法--对美国宪法的道德解读[M].上海人民出版社,2001.109.
  • 9孙笑伙.法律对行政的控制[M].山东人民出版社,133.

共引文献177

同被引文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部