期刊文献+

论历史上的“三良观”

On the View of “San-Liang” in the Chinese History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 历史上对"三良"从死穆公一事形成了三种观点:第一种观点认为"三良"被迫从死,"三良"之死罪在穆公;第二种观点认为"三良"主动从死以追随明君;第三种观点认为"三良"从死罪在康公。三种观点中,"三良"主动从死穆公的可能性较大。 Historically there were three viewpoints about the death of "San-liang". The first was that Mu-gong should be responsible for the death of "San-liang"; the second was that "San-liang"took the initiative to die so as to be with their wise king; the last one was that Kang-gong was the man who should be responsible for the death of "San-liang". Among the three views, it is more likely that "san-li- ang" took the initiative to die with their king.
作者 刘冬妮
出处 《咸阳师范学院学报》 2015年第5期1-4,共4页 Journal of Xianyang Normal University
关键词 “三良”从死 穆公 《诗经·黄鸟》 the death of"San-liang" Mu-gong the yellow birds in The Book of Songs
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1司马迁.史记[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2004.
  • 2李学勤.毛诗正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
  • 3李梦生.左传译注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2004:213.
  • 4班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
  • 5张守节.史记正义[M].北京:中华书局,2005.

共引文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部