期刊文献+

Cell replacement therapy for central nervous system diseases 被引量:2

Cell replacement therapy for central nervous system diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The brain and spinal cord can not replace neurons or supporting glia that are lost through trau- matic injury or disease. In pre-clinical studies, however, neural stem and progenitor cell transplants can promote functional recovery. Thus the central nervous system is repair competent but lacks endogenous stem cell resources. To make transplants clinically feasible, this field needs a source of histocompatible, ethically acceptable and non-tumorgenic cells. One strategy to generate pa- tient-specific replacement cells is to reprogram autologous cells such as fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells which can then be differentiated into the required cell grafts. However, the utility of pluripotent cell derived grafts is limited since they can retain founder cells with intrinsic neoplastic potential. A recent extension of this technology directly reprograms fibroblasts into the final graft- able cells without an induced pluripotent stem cell intermediate, avoiding the pluripotent caveat. For both types of reprogramming the conversion efficiency is very low resulting in the need to amplify the cells in culture which can lead to chromosomal instability and neoplasia. Thus to make reprogramming biology clinically feasible, we must improve the efficiency. The ultimate source of replacement cells may reside in directly reprogramming accessible cells within the brain. The brain and spinal cord can not replace neurons or supporting glia that are lost through trau- matic injury or disease. In pre-clinical studies, however, neural stem and progenitor cell transplants can promote functional recovery. Thus the central nervous system is repair competent but lacks endogenous stem cell resources. To make transplants clinically feasible, this field needs a source of histocompatible, ethically acceptable and non-tumorgenic cells. One strategy to generate pa- tient-specific replacement cells is to reprogram autologous cells such as fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells which can then be differentiated into the required cell grafts. However, the utility of pluripotent cell derived grafts is limited since they can retain founder cells with intrinsic neoplastic potential. A recent extension of this technology directly reprograms fibroblasts into the final graft- able cells without an induced pluripotent stem cell intermediate, avoiding the pluripotent caveat. For both types of reprogramming the conversion efficiency is very low resulting in the need to amplify the cells in culture which can lead to chromosomal instability and neoplasia. Thus to make reprogramming biology clinically feasible, we must improve the efficiency. The ultimate source of replacement cells may reside in directly reprogramming accessible cells within the brain.
出处 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第9期1356-1358,共3页 中国神经再生研究(英文版)
基金 supported by grants from the New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research(11-0015-SCR)
关键词 in vivo direct reprogramming spinal cord injury TRAUMA personalized medicine induced pluripotent stem cell embryonic stem cells in vivo direct reprogramming spinal cord injury trauma personalized medicine induced pluripotent stem cell embryonic stem cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Bechmann I (2005) Failed central nervous system regeneration - A downside of immune privilege? Neuromol Med 7:217-228.
  • 2Bertani N, Malatesta P, Volpi G, Sonego P, Perris R (2005) Neurogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells revisited: analysis by immunostaining, time-lapse video and microarray. J Cell Sci 118:3925-3936.
  • 3Blight AR (2002) Miracles and molecules - progress in spinal cord repair. Nat Neurosci 5:1051-1054.
  • 4Burke DA, Whittemore SR, Magnuson DS (2013) Consequences of common data analysis inaccuracies in CNS trauma injury basic research. J Neurotrauma 30:797-805.
  • 5Chen CP, Kiel ME, Sadowski D, McKinnon RD (2007) From stem cells to oligodendrocytes: Prospects for brain therapy. Stem Cell Rev 3:280-288.
  • 6Christophorou MA, Castelo-Branco G, Halley-Stott RP, Oliveira CS, Loos R, Radzisheuskaya A, Mowen KA, Bertone P, Silva JC, Zernicka-Goetz M, Nielsen ML, Gurdon JB, Kouzarides T (2014) Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone HI binding to chromatin. Nature 507:104- 108.
  • 7Efe JA, Hilcove S, Kim J, Zhou H, Ouyang K, Wang G, Chen J, Ding S (2011) Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy. Nat Cell Bioi 13:215-222.
  • 8Filbin MT (2003) Myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:703-713.
  • 9Freed CR, Breeze RE, Greene P, Fahn S, Tsai WY, Trojanowski JQ, Eidelberg D (2001) Transplanted dopaminergic neurons: More or less? Nat Med 7:512-513.
  • 10Gurdon JB, Melton DA (2008) Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science 322:1811-1815.

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部