期刊文献+

曲美布汀、多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良的疗效对比分析 被引量:3

Contrastive analysis of Trimebutine and Domperidone effect on functional dyspepsia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析曲美布汀、多潘立酮治疗功能性消化不良(FD)的疗效及安全性。方法将106例功能性消化不良患者分为两组:对照组53例和观察组53例。对照组给予多潘立酮,观察组给予曲美布汀,疗程均为4周。比较两组疗效、主要症状、复发情况及不良反应。结果观察组患者治疗显效率和总有效率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者餐后饱胀、上腹胀、嗳气、恶心、呕吐等症状发生率均明显低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者6个月后复发率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论曲美布汀治疗功能性消化不良的疗效优于多潘立酮,安全性好,适合临床推广应用。 Objective Contrastively analyze the effect and security of trimebutine and domperidone on functional dyspepsia ( FD ) .Methods Divided 106 cases of FD patients into observation group and control group, with 53 cases in each group.Gave domperidone to the control group and trimebutine to the observation group with a four-week course of treatment respectively.Compared the effect, cardinal symptom, recurrence and untoward effect of the groups.Results The significant efficiency and total effectiveness of the treatment in the observation group was apparently higher than that in the control group (P〈0.05);Occurrence rate of symptoms including postprandial fullness, epigastric distention, belching, nausea, emesis in the observation group was apparently lower than that in the control group ( P〈0.05 ); Recurrence rate in the observation group after 6 months was apparently lower than that in the control group ( P 〈0.05 ); There was no significant difference between the groups in untoward effect occurrence rate (P〉0.05).Conclusions Trimebutine shows better effect on FD than Domperidone with higher security, and is suitable for wide clinic application.
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2015年第24期3648-3649,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 功能性消化不良 曲美布汀 多潘立酮 疗效 Functional Dyspepsia Trimebutine Domperidone Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1王巧民,吴正祥,殷保书,郑邦海,张开光,丁西平,张明黎.合肥地区大学生功能性消化不良流行病学调查[J].中国临床保健杂志,2005,8(3):205-207. 被引量:13
  • 2王永华,毛燕玲,黄启阳.抗抑郁焦虑药物治疗功能性消化不良[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2007,16(3):230-231. 被引量:13
  • 3孙蕴伟 许斌.胃肠功能紊乱与罗马Ⅱ诊断标准[A].吴云林.消化内科新进展:第1版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.54-73.
  • 4Haque M, Wyeth JW, Staee NH, et al. Prevalence, severity and associated features of gastro-oesophageal reflux and dyspepsia: a popula- tion-based study [J]. N Z Med J, 2000, 113(1110): 178-181.
  • 5Ho KY, Kang JY, Seow A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in a multiracial Asian population, with particular reference to reflux-type symptoms [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 1998, 93(10): 1816-1822.
  • 6Staoghellini V. Three-month prevalence rates of gastrointestinal symptoms and the influence of demographic factors: Results from the Domestic/international Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST) [ J]. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl,1999, 231: 20-28.
  • 7Shaib Y, El-Scrag HB. The prevalence and risk factors of functional dyspepsia in a multiethnic population in the United States [ J ]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2004, 99( 11 ) :2210-2216.
  • 8Gsehossmann JM, Haag S, Hohmann G. Epidemiological trends of functional gastrointestinal disorders [ J ]. Dig Dis, 2001, 19 ( 3 ) : 189-194.
  • 9Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Delvaux M, et al. Rome Ⅲ : The functional gastrointestinal disorders Michel [ M]. Allen Press, 2006:433- 434.
  • 10Moayyedi P,Deeks J, Talley N J, et al. An update of the Cochrane systematic review of Helicobaeter pylori eradication therapy in nonul- cer dyspepsia: resolving the discrepancy between systematic reviews [J]. AmJ Gastroenterol, 2003, 98(12), 2621-2626.

共引文献168

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部