期刊文献+

Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Various Modes of Vaginal Deliveries in Chinese Women 被引量:2

Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Various Modes of Vaginal Deliveries in Chinese Women
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) can cause an adverse impact on women's physical and mental health. There was lack of published data in Chinese population particularly on studying the risk of OASIS for nonrotational outlet forceps. This study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of OASIS. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study carried out in a tertiary referral hospital in Hong Kong. The control group was selected randomly. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on OASIS. This study reviewed the obstetric records of OASIS women and random control from January 2011 to June 2014. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on OASIS. Results: Of 15,446 women delivered, 49 had OASIS. The percentage of OASIS increased from 0.3% (2011) to 0.38% (2014). There was an increasing trend of OASIS in attempted spontaneous vaginal delivery without episiotorny (P 〈 0.01)~ but it did not increase the OASIS risk (P = 0.46). Univariate analysis of 49 cases and 438 control subjects showed that forceps delivery (odds ratio [OR] -8.73, P 〈 0.01 ), prolong second stage of labor (OR = 1.43, P 〈 0.01) increased the risk lbr OASIS. In multivariate regression models, only lbrceps delivery (OR = 6.28, P 〈 0.01) proved to be independent risk factor. Conclusions: The incidence of OASIS in Chinese women was increased alter 2012, but still lower than the reported figures in the literature. Outlet forceps delivery could be a possible associated risk factor. Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) can cause an adverse impact on women's physical and mental health. There was lack of published data in Chinese population particularly on studying the risk of OASIS for nonrotational outlet forceps. This study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of OASIS. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study carried out in a tertiary referral hospital in Hong Kong. The control group was selected randomly. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on OASIS. This study reviewed the obstetric records of OASIS women and random control from January 2011 to June 2014. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on OASIS. Results: Of 15,446 women delivered, 49 had OASIS. The percentage of OASIS increased from 0.3% (2011) to 0.38% (2014). There was an increasing trend of OASIS in attempted spontaneous vaginal delivery without episiotorny (P 〈 0.01)~ but it did not increase the OASIS risk (P = 0.46). Univariate analysis of 49 cases and 438 control subjects showed that forceps delivery (odds ratio [OR] -8.73, P 〈 0.01 ), prolong second stage of labor (OR = 1.43, P 〈 0.01) increased the risk lbr OASIS. In multivariate regression models, only lbrceps delivery (OR = 6.28, P 〈 0.01) proved to be independent risk factor. Conclusions: The incidence of OASIS in Chinese women was increased alter 2012, but still lower than the reported figures in the literature. Outlet forceps delivery could be a possible associated risk factor.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第18期2420-2425,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Anal Incontinence: Operative Vaginal Delivery Postnatal Care Anal Incontinence: Operative Vaginal Delivery Postnatal Care
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA, Devillé W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: Risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:563-6.
  • 2Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:724-6.
  • 3Fynes M, Aterson V, O′Connell R, O′Herlihy C. Caesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:496-500.
  • 4Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Mahmood TA, et al. Impact of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears at first birth on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: A cohort study. BJOG 2014;121:1695-703.
  • 5Sultan AH. Editorial: Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 1999;5:193-6.
  • 6Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: Incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 2008;247:224-37.
  • 7Varma A, Gunn J, Gardiner A, Lindow SW, Duthie GS. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: Prospective evaluation of incidence. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1537-43.
  • 8Ismail SI, Puyk B. The rise of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): 11-year trend analysis using Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) data. J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;34:495-8.
  • 9Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: Time trends and risk factors. BJOG 2013;120:1516-25.
  • 10Jang? H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosth?j S, Sakse A. Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: A population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:59.e1-6.

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部