摘要
针对建筑能耗模拟用的Sandia,CSWD,CTYW,TPCY 4种典型气象年生成方法,选取典型城市西安,用相同的原始气象数据,取30a为周期,比较这几种方法生成典型气象年的差异及其对建筑能耗模拟结果的影响。结果表明:4种方法挑选出的典型气象年均优先选取前5项时,有重复出现,挑选出的典型气象年差异很小;CTYW方法挑选出的典型气象年模拟能耗最接近逐年模拟能耗,相对标准偏差为10.37%,其次是TPCY,CSWD,Sandia方法。
Researches the difference of the typical meteorological years (TMY) generated by four methods, namely Sandia, CSWD, CTYW and TPCY, and the effect on the simulation of the building energy consumption in Xi' an using the same meteorological data of thirty-year period. The results show that the selected TMY is repeated and the difference is very small when selecting the top five items as priority in the above four methods. The simulated energy consumption with the TMY selected by the CTYW method is the most close to the simulated energy consumption year by year, and the relative standard deviation is 10.37%, followed by TPCY, CSWD and Sandia methods.
出处
《暖通空调》
北大核心
2015年第9期59-63,共5页
Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning
基金
"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目"可再生能源建筑应用与建筑节能设计基础数据库研发"(编号:2014BAJ01B01)
关键词
典型气象年
生成方法
建筑能耗模拟
典型月
权重因子
干球温度
typical meteorological year, generating method, building energy consumption simulation,typical meteorological month, weight factor, dry-bulb.temperature