摘要
认知语法从语言的交互功能出发提出了入场理论。作为一种语义功能,入场在形式上表征为语言中的入场系统,实现于一切名词短语与限定小句中。本文聚焦于名词短语入场系统(限定词系统),以汉语光杆名词为切入点,表明光杆名词表类指时并未入场,进而主张类指表达与入场因素无关,类指名词短语的限定成分与入场功能之间并不存在象似性。这表明当前入场理论存在过于严格的限制,形义一致性难以得到有效贯彻。
Based on the interactive function of language,Cognitive Grammar comes up with the grounding theory.As a semantic function,grounding is formally represented as the grounding system in language,which is held to find realization in all nominals and finite clauses.Focusing on nominal grounding system(i.e.the determiner system),and taking Chinese bare nouns as point of access,this paper suggests that bare nouns remain ungrounded when denoting generic reference,and further argues that generic expressions have nothing to do with grounding,and that there is no iconic mapping between the determinant elements in generic NPs and the grounding function.This suggests that current grounding theory has posed too stringent constraints on form-meaning correspondence,which is difficult to hold in effect.
出处
《当代外语研究》
2015年第8期18-25,77,共8页
Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
