期刊文献+

淮河中上游水生态健康影响因子及其健康评价 被引量:34

Impact factors and health assessment of aquatic ecosystem in Upper and Middle Huai River Basin
原文传递
导出
摘要 在对淮河中上游10个断面水体理化指标、浮游植物、浮游动物、底栖动物及栖息地状况等实地调查和监测的基础上,结合提出的河流水生态健康定义,采用频度统计法和相关性分析法对评价指标进行筛选,并用熵权法确定指标权重,构建水生态健康评价指标体系和健康评价标准体系;运用水生态健康综合指数法和水体水质综合污染指数对河流水生态健康状况进行评价,并根据评价结果提出对策和建议。结果表明:60%的监测断面处于"亚病态"或"病态"水平,其中监测断面D5(槐店闸)处于"病态"水平;综合污染指数表明该河段水体均存在一定程度的污染,其中监测断面D5是"重污染"。研究表明淮河中上游水生态退化较严重,需要加强水生态修复及水环境污染综合治理。 Based on the investigation of water quality, phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthonic animal and habitat conditions of 10 hydrologic sections in upper and middle Huai River Basin on December, 2012, and combined with the proposed definition of the water ecological health of river, the indicators for the health assessment of aquatic ecosystem were screened by the methods of frequency statistics and correlation analysis, and the weights of these indicators were determined with entropy method. Health assessment indi- cator system and health assessment standard system for rivers were constructed, and comprehensive index method of water ecological health and comprehensive pollution index of water quality were used to evaluate river ecosystem health, respectively. Then, according to the evaluation results, the counter measures and suggestions were put forward. Among the sections evaluated, 60 % of them were in "sub-morbid" or "mor- bidity" grade, and monitoring cross section D5 (Huaidian Sluice) was "morbid" grade; the results of water quality comprehensive pollution index showed that all the monitoring cross sections had pollution, and moni- toring cross section D5 even was "heavy pollution". The findings suggest that the water ecological degrada- tion of the upper and middle Huai River Basin is more serious, and it is necessary need to further strengthen the ecological restoration and comprehensive management of water pollution.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期1019-1027,共9页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41271005 U1304509 51279183) 河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划(13IRTSTHN030)
关键词 河流水生态 影响因子 健康评价 对策及建议 淮河中上游 water ecology impact factors health assessment counter measures and suggestions upperand middle Huai River Basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1梁静静,左其亭,窦明.淮河流域水生态区划研究[J].水电能源科学,2011,29(1):20-22. 被引量:14
  • 2左其亭,李冬锋.重污染河流闸坝防污限制水位研究[J].水利水电技术,2013,44(1):22-26. 被引量:4
  • 3吴阿娜,杨凯,车越,袁雯.河流健康状况的表征及其评价[J].水科学进展,2005,16(4):602-608. 被引量:166
  • 4Karr J K . Bioligical intergrity: a long neglected aspect of water resource management [J] . Ecological Applica- tions, 1991, 1(1):66-84.
  • 5An K G, Park S S, Shin J Y . An evaluation of a river health using the index of biological integrity along with rela- tion to chemical and habitat conditions[ J] . Environment International, 2002, 28(5) : 411-420.
  • 6Meyer J L. Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology[J] . Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 1997, 16: 439-447.
  • 7Rogers K . Integrating indicators, endpoints and value systems in strategic management of the river of the Kruger National Park[J] . Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41(2) : 254-263 .
  • 8Vugteveen P, Leuven R S, Huijbregts M A, et al . Redefinition and elaboration of river ecosystem health: Per- spective for River Management[J] . Hydrobiologia, 2006, 565( 1 ) : 289-308 .
  • 9胡春宏,陈建国,郭庆超,陈绪坚.论维持黄河健康生命的关键技术与调控措施[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2005,3(1):1-5. 被引量:25
  • 10Wright J F, Armitage P D, Furse M T, et al . Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements [J]. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1989, 4(2) : 147-155 .

二级参考文献189

共引文献1236

同被引文献508

引证文献34

二级引证文献342

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部