期刊文献+

基于Cournot-Bertrand混合竞争的企业集团转移定价决策 被引量:5

Transfer pricing strategy for multi-divisional firm under CournotBertrand mixed competition
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究多部门企业集团在最终产品市场面临Cournot-Bertrand混合竞争时的转移定价决策问题.由动态博弈的逆向归纳求解方法可知,均衡转移定价策略将随着最终产品之间的关系而有所差异.当竞争对手仅生产最终产品时,最优转移价格高于边际成本,且采用价格-产量竞争优于产量-价格竞争;当竞争对手为垂直一体化企业时,采用产量-价格竞争的最优转移价格高于边际成本,采用价格-产量竞争则低于边际成本,而且采用产量-价格竞争优于价格-产量竞争. The multi-divisional firm's transfer pricing policy under Cournot-Bertrand mixed competition in final goods market is analyzed. By using the backward induction in a dynamic game, the equilibrium transfer pricing strategies can change with the differentiation of the final goods. If the competitor produces only the final output, the optimal internal transfer price is higher than the marginal cost and optimal strategy is price-output competition. If the rival firm is vertically integrated, the optimal transfer price is higher(lower) than the marginal cost under output-price(price-output) competition.Moreover, output-price competition is superior to the price-output strategy for the multi-divisional firm.
作者 万寿义 王静
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1907-1910,共4页 Control and Decision
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJC880165)
关键词 Cournot-Bertrand混合竞争 转移定价 边际成本 Cournot-Bertrand mixed competition transfer pricing marginal cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Alles M, Datar S. Strategic transfer pricing[J]. Management Science, 1998,44(4): 451-46l.
  • 2Gox R F, Schilier U. An economic perspective on transfer pricing[C]. Handbook of Management Accounting Research. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007, 2: 673-695.
  • 3Gox R F. Strategic transfer pricing, absorption costing and vertical integration[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2000, 11(3): 327-348.
  • 4慕银平,唐小我,马永开.不对称竞争条件下的集团转移定价决策[J].控制与决策,2005,20(2):165-169. 被引量:15
  • 5张福利,白宇欣,达庆利.下游市场存在竞争的企业集团转移定价研究[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(6):90-93. 被引量:3
  • 6慕银平,唐小我,刘英.信息不对称条件下寡头集团转移定价决策分析[J].控制与决策,2008,23(1):30-34. 被引量:6
  • 7Chang W, Ryu H. Optimal transfer pricing: Competition mode, demand and strategic characteristics, and production technology[J]. Global J of Economics, 2013, 2(1): 1-21.
  • 8Sato T. On Coumot-Bertrand mixed duopolies],l], The Japanese Economic Review, 1996,47(4): 412-420.
  • 9Tremblay C, Tremblay V. The Coumot-Bertrand model and the degree of product differentiationl J]. Economic Letters, 2011, 111(3): 233-235.
  • 10Singh N, Vives X. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated oligopoly[J]. RAND J of Economics, 1984, 15(4): 546-554.

二级参考文献46

  • 1慕银平,唐小我,马永开.不对称竞争条件下的集团转移定价决策[J].控制与决策,2005,20(2):165-169. 被引量:15
  • 2Hirshleifer J. On the economics of transfer pricing[J].J of Business, 1956,29 (3) : 172-184.
  • 3Solomons D. Divisional Performance, Measurement and Control[M]. Hornewood IL, 1965.
  • 4Horngren C T, Foster G. Cost Accounting. A Managerial Emphais[M]. NJ: Prentice Ha11,1987.
  • 5Arrow K. Control in large organizations [ J ].Management Science, 1964,10(3) ; 397-408.
  • 6Samuels J. Opportunity costing.. An application of mathematical programming [J ]. d of Accounting Research, 1965,3(2) : 182-191.
  • 7Benke R L Jr, Edwards J D. Transfer Pricing:Techniques and Uses [M ]. New York: National Association of Accountants, 1980.
  • 8Harris M, Kriebel C, Raviv A. Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation [J]. Management Science, 1982,28 (6) : 604-620.
  • 9Amershi Amin H, Peter Cheng. Intrafirm resource allocation: The economics of transfer pricing and cost allocations in accounting[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1990,7 (5) : 61-99.
  • 10Vaysman Igor. A model of cost-based transfer pricing[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 1996,1 (1): 73-108.

共引文献19

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部