摘要
目的分析在广泛粘连性肠梗阻的治疗中采用小肠内排列术和传统肠梗阻手术的区别。方法将我院30例广泛粘连性肠梗阻患者随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组采用传统肠梗阻手术治疗,观察组则采用小肠内排列术治疗。结果对照组的手术时间短于观察组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;观察组的手术出血量、术后排气时间、术后排便时间、住院时间少于对照组,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,P>0.05,差异不具有统计学意义。结论在广泛粘连性肠梗阻的治疗中采用小肠内排列术可获得良好的效果。
Objective Analysis in the treatment of extensive adhesion sex intestinal obstruction in the intestine lined the difference between art and traditional intestinal obstruction operation.Methods Selected 30 patients with extensive adhesion sex intestinal obstruction patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group with traditional intestinal obstruction surgery, observation group used the small intestine for the treatment of arrangement.Results The control group operating time was shorter than observation group,P〈0.05, had difference statistically significance, the observation group of surgery, blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative defecation time, length of hospital stay were less than the control group obviously,P〈0.05, had difference statistically signiifcance, the observation group complication rate was lower than the control group,P〉0.05, had no difference statistically signiifcance. Conclusion In the treatment of extensive adhesion sex intestinal obstruction the small intestine internal arrangement can had good effect.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第26期114-115,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
广泛粘连性肠梗阻
小肠内排列术
传统肠梗阻手术
Extensive intestinal obstruction
Plication in the small intestine
Intestinal surgery tradition