期刊文献+

音乐干预对孕期应激仔鼠恐惧行为的影响及相关机制

Effect and Mechanism of Music Exposure on Fearful Behavior of Prenatal Stressed Rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究音乐干预对孕期应激仔鼠恐惧行为和杏仁核胃泌素释放肽受体(GRPR)表达的影响。方法 Wistar孕鼠16只随机分为应激组(n=8)和对照组(n=8)。应激组妊娠11-20 d每天将其置于窄小的固定器中并给予强光照射。对照组不给予刺激。应激组仔鼠出生后第1天起,予播放音乐(SM组)或相同分贝的白噪音(SW组),SC组不给予刺激。生后60 d行防御退缩试验,免疫荧光组织化学和荧光实时定量PCR测定杏仁核GRPR及其mRNA表达。结果与其他两组比较,SM组仔鼠潜伏期显著缩短(P〈0.001),出小室次数显著增多(P〈0.001);杏仁核GRPR阳性细胞计数及mRNA表达显著增加(P〈0.001)。结论生后给予音乐干预可以纠正孕期应激仔鼠异常的恐惧行为,同时伴有杏仁核GRPR高表达。 Objective To investigate the effect of postnatal music exposure on fearful behavior of prenatal stressed rats in defensive withdrawal test and the expression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor(GRPR) in the amygdala. Methods Wistar pregnant rats were divided in stress group(n=8) and control group(n=8). The stress group were immobilized and bright lighted 45 min, 3 times a day, when gestation 11-20 days, while the control group without any stress. The new born rats from the stress group were exposed in music(SM group) or white noise(SW group) for 45 min twice a day since 1 day after born, and the rats from the control(SC) group left undisturbed. They were tested with defensive withdrawal test 60 days after birth, and the GRPR levels in the amygdala were measured with immunofluorescence and real-time PCR. Results The latency was shorter and the frequence out of the chamber was the most in the SM group of the defensive withdrawal test(P〈0.001), while GRPR-positive cells and GRPR mRNA increased in amygdala(P〈0.001). Conclusion Postnatal music exposure can counteract the abnormal behavior response of prenatal stressed offspring and accompany with increased expression of GRPR in the amygdala.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期1016-1019,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 孕期应激 音乐疗法 胃泌素释放肽受体 杏仁核 防御退缩试验 大鼠 prenatal stress music exposure gastrin-releasing peptide receptor amygdala defensive withdrawal test rats
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1郑玉章,陈菁菁.音乐治疗学的定义、形成及其在中国的发展[J].音乐探索,2004(3):91-94. 被引量:98
  • 2李舜,丘卫红,万桂芳.早期旋律语调言语治疗对Broca失语患者的疗效观察[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(5):456-457. 被引量:14
  • 3Bruscia KE. Defining Music Therapy [M]. 2nd ed. New Braun-fels: Barcelona Publishers, 1998.
  • 4Acette A, Bard C, Peretz I. Making non-fluent aphasics speak:sing along! [J]. Brain, 2006, 129(10): 2571-2584.
  • 5Ozdemir E, Norton A, Schlaug G. Shared and distinct neuralcorrelates of singing and speaking [J]. Neuroimage, 2006, 33(2):628-635.
  • 6Tomaino CM. Effective music therapy techniques in the treat-ment of nonfluent aphasia [J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2012, 1252(4): 312-317.
  • 7Brotons M, Koger SM. The impact of music therapy on lan-guage functioning in dementia [J]. J Music Ther, 2000, 37(3):183-195.
  • 8Tamplin J. A pilot study into the effect of vocal exercises andsinging on dysarthric speech [J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2008,23(3):207-216.
  • 9Thaut MH, McIntosh KW, McIntosh GC, et al. Auditory rhyth-micity enhances movement and speech motor control in pa-tients with Parkinson's disease [J]. Funct Neurol, 2001, 16(2):163-172.
  • 10Pilon MA, McIntosh KW, Thaut MH. Auditory vs. visualspeech timing cues as external rate control to enhance verbal in-telligibility in mixed spastic-ataxic dysarthric speakers: a pilotstudy [J]. Brain Inj, 1998,12(9): 793-803.

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部