期刊文献+

论基础研究与应用研究之区分在专利法上的表达 被引量:3

On the Expression of the Distinction between Basic Research and Applied Research in Patent Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基础研究和应用研究具有不同的性质。基础研究宜由政府推动,而应用研究则应由企业承担。专利作为科技进步手段的一种,更适合于应用研究而非基础研究。专利法上实用性要件的内在规定性、标准高低的可变性以及因产业而多元化的特点,使该制度能充分有效地保障和促进应用研究的发展,同时把基础研究排除在可专利性范围之外。专利实用性要件是执行专利法区分基础研究和应用研究这一价值目标的合适工具。 Both basic research and applied research have different properties. Basic research should be promoted by the government, while applied research should be engaged by the enterprise. As a scientific and technological progress means, the patent is more suitable for applied research rather than basic research. Internal regulation, vari- ability of standard level as well as industrial diversified characteristics of practicability element can fully and effec- tively protect and promote the development of applied research. At the same time, the basic research will be ex- cluded in the scope of patent. The practicability element is the proper tool to perform the value goal of patent law which can be used to distinguish basic research and applied research.
作者 杨德桥
出处 《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第3期12-19,共8页 Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 基础研究 应用研究 专利 实用性要件 basic research applied research patent practicability element
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1V.Bush.Science-The Endless Frontier:A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research[EB/OL].[2011-10-20].[2015-03-10].http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/vb ush1954.htm.16.
  • 2Donald E.Stokes.Pasteur’s Quadrant:Basic Science and Technological Innovation[M].Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,1997.p8.
  • 3姜丰,李剑龙.没有人能预见基础研究的应用——专访2012年诺贝尔物理奖得主阿罗什和维因兰[N].南方周末,2012-12-20(E25).
  • 4王云心.对我国基础理论研究的几点思考[J].科学管理研究,1993,11(1):21-24. 被引量:2
  • 5崔国斌.专利法:原理与案例[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:655.
  • 6[美]威廉·M.兰德斯,理查德·A.波斯纳.知识产权法的经济结构[M].金海军,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 7Robert Patrick Merges.Patent Law and Policy:cases and materials[M].The Michie Company,1997.p63~65.
  • 8袁真富.发现权诸问题与新展望[J].中国发明与专利,2009,6(11):21-25. 被引量:2
  • 9Arti Kaur Rai.Regulating Scientific Research:Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science,94 N W.U.L.REV.77,100(1999).
  • 10张晋藩.综论百年法学与法治中国[J].中国法学,2005(5):185-192. 被引量:18

二级参考文献123

  • 1李杨.人权,还是知识产权?——印度遭遇特殊的药品专利诉讼[J].中国新闻周刊,2007(9):55-57. 被引量:4
  • 2State Stree Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. , 149 F. 3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998) .
  • 3In re Bilski, 545 F. 3d 943 ( Fed. Cir. 2008 ) .
  • 4Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S. Ct. 3218 (2010) .
  • 5US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 8.
  • 6US Patent Act of 1790, Section 1.
  • 7USPTO, Automated Financial or Management Data Processing Methods ( Business Methods ) , White Paper Ver. 1.43, issued in 2000 , at 6 -7. Available at http: //www. uspto, gov/patents/resources/methods/whitepaper, pdf.
  • 8《国际专利分类表》第八版.
  • 9Edmund Burke Commisioner of Patents, List of Patents for hwentions and Designs, issued by the United States from 1790 to 1847.
  • 10USPTO, Automated Financial or Management Data Processing Methods ( Business Methods ) , White Paper Ver. 1.43, issued in 2000 , at 2-3 Available at http: //www. uspto, gov/patents/resources/methods/whitepaper, pdf.

共引文献134

同被引文献18

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部