期刊文献+

舒张期面积应变指数判断左前降支重度狭窄的价值 被引量:1

The value of area strain imaging diastolic index for predicting left anterior descending severe stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 应用三维斑点追踪技术获取左前降支(LAD)供血心肌节段的舒张期面积应变指数(ASI-DI),探讨其在判断LAD重度狭窄以及定位狭窄部位方面的价值.方法 自2012年7月至2014年4月,入选在武汉大学人民医院拟诊冠心病的住院患者92例进行回顾性分析.冠状动脉造影前检查超声心动图,研究对象的左心室射血分数≥50%,且无节段性室壁运异常.根据LAD狭窄程度,将患者分为3组:重度狭窄组(狭窄程度≥75%),共36例;轻中度狭窄组(狭窄程度1%~74%),共22例;对照组(冠状动脉无狭窄),共34例.应用三维斑点追踪技术获取整体收缩期峰值面积应变(GPSAS)、整体舒张期面积应变指数(GASI-DI)以及节段心肌的ASI-DI等超声心动图参数.绘制节段心肌ASI-DI判断LAD重度狭窄的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,获取最优节段和截断值.结果 重度狭窄组、轻中度狭窄组和对照组之间的GPSAS差异无统计学意义[分别为(-25.2±6.2)%、(-20.3±6.6)%和(-21.3±8.6)%,P=0.159].重度狭窄组的GASI-DI值均小于轻中度狭窄组和对照组[分别为(-34.3±14.7)%、(-48.1±13.3)%和(-59.4±12.2)%,P均<0.01],轻中度狭窄组的GASI-DI值与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.217).前壁基底段ASI-DI判断LAD近段重度狭窄的ROC曲线下面积为0.829,截断值为40.3%,敏感度和特异度分别为0.96和0.63;前间壁中间段ASI-DI判断LAD中远段重度狭窄的ROC曲线下面积为0.843,截断值为38.8%,敏感度和特异度分别为0.967和0.651.结论 ASI-DI可以筛选出左心室射血分数≥50%且无节段性室壁运异常的LAD重度狭窄患者.前壁基底段和前间壁中间段ASI-DI能够较好地分别定位LAD近段和中远段重度狭窄. Objective To evaluate the value of locating and defining severe stenosis of left anterior descending (LAD) with area strain imaging diastolic indexes (ASI-DI) derived from three dimensional speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI).Methods A total of 92 suspected coronary heart disease patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and without regional wall motion abnormality,who underwent echocardiography before coronary angiography in our department from July 2012 to April 2014,were included in this retrospective study.Patients were divided into three groups by the level of LAD stenosis:severe stenosis group (≥75%,n =36),mild to moderate stenosis group (1%-74%,n =22) and control group (without coronary artery stenosis,n =34).Global peak systolic area strain (GPSAS),global ASI-DI (GASI-DI),and ASI-DI of the regional myocardial segments with blood supplied by LAD were measured.Receiver operating curves (ROC) were obtained between ASI-DI and stenosis level of LAD to locate and to find out the optimal segment and cutoff values.Results There was no significant difference of GPSAS among serious stenosis group,mild and moderate stenosis group and control group ((-25.2 ± 6.2)% vs.(-20.3 ±6.6)% vs.(-21.3 ±8.6)%,P =0.159).GASI-DI was significantly lower in severe stenosis group than in mild to moderate stenosis group and control group ((-34.3 ± 14.7) vs.(-48.1±13.3)% vs.(-59.4 ± 12.2)%,both P〈0.01).GASI-DI was similar between mild to moderate stenosis group and control group (P =0.217).The optimal cutoff values of ASI-DI were 40.3% and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.829 in the base anterior segment for detecting proximal severe stenosis of LAD (sensitivity 0.967,specificity 0.651),38.3% and 0.843 in the middle anteroseptum for detecting mid-distal sever stenosis of LAD (sensitivity 0.967,specificity 0.651).Conclusions Patients with severe LAD stenosis can be screened by ASI-DI among patients with LVEF≥50% and without regional wall motion abnormality.The ASI-DI of base anterior segment and middle anteroseptum can be used to locate the proximal and mid-distal sever stenosis of LAD.
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期793-797,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 湖北省卫生厅一般项目(JX6816)
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 超声心动描记术 Coronary disease Echocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tatarchenko IP, Pozdniakova NV, Morozova OI, et al. Clinical functional assessment of electric cardiac instability in diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle in patients with coronary heart disease[ J]. Ter Arkh ,2011,83 ( 12 ) :34-38.
  • 2Kimura K, Takenaka K, Pan X, et al. Prediction of coronary artery stenosis using strain imaging diastolic index at rest in patients with preserved ejection fraction[ J ]. J Cardiol, 2011, 57(3) :311-315.
  • 3Yang B, Daimon M, Ishii K, et al. Prediction of coronary artery stenosis at rest in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion. Segmental analyses using strain imaging diastolic index [ J ]. Int Heart J, 2013, 54(5):266-272.
  • 4Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification [ J ]. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2006, 7 (2) :79- 108.
  • 5Hahn JY, Chun WJ, Kim JH, et al. Predietom and outcomes of side braneh occlusion after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions : results from the COBIS 11 Registry ( Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013,62 ( 18 ) : 1654-1659.
  • 6Serruys PW, Moriee MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Pereutaneous eoronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360 (10) :961-972.
  • 7Sun JL, Han R, Guo JH, et al. The diagnostie value of treadmill exercise test parameters for coronary artery disease [ J ]. Cell Bioehem Biophys,2013, 65 ( 1 ) :69-76.
  • 8Schuijf JD, Shaw LJ, Wijns W, et al. Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities[ J]. Heart, 2005, 91 (8) : 1110-1117.
  • 9谭团团,周青,宋宏宁,郭娟,郭瑞强.纵向舒张期应变指数检测并定位冠状动脉重度狭窄[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2014,23(9):751-756. 被引量:5
  • 10刘芳,林箐,丁磊,孙燕淑,范琰,刘倩竹,刘梅林.三维斑点追踪成像定量评价冠状动脉疾病患者左心室局部收缩功能[J].中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(10):850-856. 被引量:15

二级参考文献25

  • 1Helle-Valle T, Crosby J, Edvardsen T, et al. New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation : speckle tracking echocardiography. Circulation, 2005,112:3149-3156.
  • 2P6rez de Isla L,Balcones DV, Fern6ndez-Golfin C, et al. Three- dimensional-wall motion tracking: a new and faster tool for myocardial strain assessment: comparison with two-dimensional- wall motion tracking. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22:325- 330.
  • 3Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Eehocardiography's Guide-lines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echoeardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2005,18 : 1440-1463.
  • 4American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboralories. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1991,18:1149-1182.
  • 5Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring systerm for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol, 1983,51: 606.
  • 6Feigenbaum H, Mastouri R, Sawada S, et al. A practical approach to using strain echocardiography to evaluate the left ventricle. Circ J, 2012,76 : 1550-1555.
  • 7Seo Y, Ishizu T, Enomoto Y, et al. Validation of 3-dimensional speckle tracking imaging to quantify regional myocardial deformation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009,2:451-459.
  • 8Nesser HJ, Mor-Avi V, Gorissen W, et al. Quantification of' left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI. Eur Heart J, 2009,30 : 1565-1573.
  • 9Brown J, Jerkins C, Marwick TH. Use of myocmxJial strain to assess global left ventricular function:a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and 3-dimensional echoeardiography. Am Heart J, 2009, 157 :el-e5.
  • 10Macron L, Lim P, Bensaid A, et at. Single-beat versus multibeat real-time 3D echocardiography for assessing left ventrieular volumes and ejection fraction: a comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010,3:450-455.

共引文献18

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部