期刊文献+

个体化时代的文化抉择和社会治理——以孔子为中心的分析 被引量:2

Individualized Era's Cultural Choice and Social Governance:An Analysis Centering on Confucius
原文传递
导出
摘要 个体化时代的社会治理是当前学术界研究的重点。先秦时期,个体觉醒从政治上层开始,"亲亲"、"尊尊"的礼乐原则遭到践踏,宗法制和分封制逐渐瓦解,周礼依据"天"确立的合法性原则面临危机。在"礼崩乐坏"的背景下,政治权力出现无序化的走向,诸侯间力斗争霸、统治上层的腐败堕落导致天下动荡不安,黎民颠沛流离。面对此种危局,孔子适时地提出"仁"作为评判一切社会规范的标准,重构礼乐规范,促使权力从无序走向有序,以此确立新型的社会治理模式。孔子将此重任寄托于新兴崛起的士人群体,希望士人完成从知识人到道德人的转变,自觉肩负道统,承担国家与社会治理的重任。在孔子看来,士人道德治理主要包括三个层面:其一,确立以仁德为根基的天道作为政治权力的合法性原则;其二,促使政府权力走向理性化;其三,通过孝悌之道的推行重建民间社会秩序。孔子期望通过士人的道德治理模式最终实现国家与社会的有序运行。 Individualized era's social governance is the focus of current academic research. In the pre-Qin period, individual awakening started from political elites, and trampled over the ritual principle that advocated association with those that were closely related and honoring those who were honored. The patriarchal clan system and feudal system gradually collapsed. The legality of Zhou' s ritual that was based on the concept of the "Heaven" was faced with crisis. Against the background of the ritual system' s disintegration, the political power was disoriented. The incessant fights be- tween the dukes and princes and the corruption of the governing class led to the upheaval of the society and the suffering of the homeless. Against such a backdrop, Confucius promptly claimed that benevolence was the criterion to evaluate all social disciplines. He reconstructed social ritual, restored the disoriented power back to order, and formed accordingly a new model of social governance. Confucius assigned this great mission to the newly emerged class of scholars, hoping that they would transform themselves from people who espoused knowledge to people who advocated morality. He hoped that they would voluntarily take upon themselves the mission to govern the society and the country with morality. Confucius believed that there were three perspectives in scholars' governance: first, to establish the way of heaven which is based on benevolence as the legitimacy of the government; second, to rationalize the power of the government; third, to reestablish social order through the implementation of filial and fraternal duties. Confucius hoped that the state and the society could ultimately resumed their order with the help of scholars' moral governance.
作者 宣朝庆 陈强
出处 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期19-26,共8页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费重大项目培育计划(NKZXZD1406)
关键词 个体化社会 道德治理 孔子 士人 Individualized Society Moral Governance Confucius Benevolence Scholars
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王斌.个体化社会的困局、整合与本土启示——对齐格蒙特·鲍曼个体化理论的再评判[J].学习与实践,2014(6):99-106. 被引量:12
  • 2休斯顿·史密斯:《人的宗教》,刘安云译,海口:海南出版社,2013年,第153、160页.
  • 3卡尔·雅斯贝斯.《历史的起源与目标》,魏楚雄,俞新天译.北京:华夏出版社,1989年,第98页.
  • 4来:《古代思想文化的世界:春秋时代的宗教、伦理与社会思想》,上海:三联书店,2002年,第3页.
  • 5迪尔凯姆:《社会学方法的准则》,狄玉明译,北京:商务印书馆,2007年,第23-25页.
  • 6雷海宗:《春秋时代政治与社会》,雷海宗:《伯伦史学集》,北京:中华书局,2002年,第271页.
  • 7常金仓:《穷变通久:文化史学的理论与实践》,沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1988年,第179页.
  • 8常金仓:《西周典范政治及其文化基础》,陕西历史博物馆编:《西周史论文集》(下),西安:陕西人民教育出版社,1993年,第706页.
  • 9《论语·颜渊》,长春.吉林文史出版社,2007年,第90页.
  • 10.《论语·季氏》[M].,.第172页.

二级参考文献20

  • 1郑杭生,杨敏.现代性过程中“个人”的创生与集体化 行走在自我创新前夜的“个人”[J].社会,2006,26(2):1-17. 被引量:20
  • 2齐格蒙特·鲍曼.《被围困的社会》,郇建立译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2005年.
  • 3齐格蒙特·鲍曼.《个体化社会》,上海:上海三联书店,2002年,第175页.
  • 4齐格蒙特·鲍曼.《共同体》,南京:江苏人民出版社,2007年,第78页.
  • 5齐格蒙特·鲍曼.《流动的现代性》,第10页,欧阳景根译,上海,上海三联书店,2002.
  • 6乌尔里希·贝克.《风险社会》,何博闻译,南京:译林出版社,2003年版,15页.
  • 7阎云翔:《中国社会的个体化》,陆洋等译,上海:上海译文出版社,2012年,第4、11-14页.
  • 8肖瑛.《把个人带回社会》,载应星,李猛编.《社会理论:现代性与本土化》,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012年,第267页.
  • 9Atkinson,W.Not All That Was Solid Has Melted into Air (or Liquid): A Critique of Bauman on Individualization and Class in Liquid Modernity. The Sociological Review. Vol.56, No.l,2008,PP.1-2.
  • 10齐格蒙特·鲍曼.《生活在碎片之中》,郁建兴译,上海,学林出版社,2002年,第86页.

共引文献261

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部