期刊文献+

紫杉醇联合表阿霉素在局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗中的近期疗效观察 被引量:2

Observation on the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and epirubicin for locally advanced breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究的目的是观察新辅助化疗方案表阿霉素联合紫杉醇的近期临床疗效和毒性反应情况。方法将31例局部进展期乳腺癌患者术前给予表阿霉素联合紫杉醇4周期化疗,表阿霉素60 mg/㎡d1,紫杉醇175mg/㎡d1每3周为1个周期,出现严重的毒副反应或疾病进展才准予停药。结果所有患者术前共行119个周期的化疗;31例患者中29例患者接受了4个周期的化疗。术后出现完全缓解(CR)4例和部分缓解(PR)21例;病情稳定(SD)4例和疾病进展(PD)2例。最常见的Ⅰ/Ⅱ级毒性反应为脱发,最常见的Ⅲ/Ⅳ级毒性反应为中性粒细胞减少症。无1例因毒性反应引起死亡。结论该研究表明:新辅助化疗表阿霉素联合紫杉醇方案的病理反应疗效令人鼓舞,并提示表柔比星在心脏毒性方面可能是替代阿霉素的最佳选择。 Objective:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NC)is yet to be established as the definitive treatment regimen for locally advanced breast cancer(LABC). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of NC with epiru-bicin and paclitaxel. Methods:31 patients with LABC were enrolled in study. All patients were scheduled to receive four cy-cles of 60 mg/ m2 epirubicin and 175 mg/ m2 paclitaxel every 3 weeks,preoperatively,unless they developed profound side effects or disease progression. Results:In all,119 cycles of chemotherapy were administered preoperatively;29 of the 31 patients underwent all four cycles of designated treatment. Complete disappearance of invasive foci of the primary tumor, and negative axillary lymph nodes were confirmed in four patients,post operation. Partial remission(PR)21 cases,Stable disease(SD)4 cases and Progression disease(PD)2 cases. The most common gradeⅠ/ Ⅱtoxicities were alopecia. Neutro-penia was the most common grade 3 / 4 toxicity. However,none of the toxicities resulted in cessation of the treatment. Con-clusion:The encouraging pathologic response observed in the patients treated with epirubicin plus paclitaxel NC in this study suggests that epirubicin could be a substitute for doxorubicin,which is the most cardiotoxic agent.
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第6期621-624,共4页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词 乳腺癌 新辅助化疗 表柔比星 紫杉醇 breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy epirubicin paclitaxel
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1马行天,孙正魁,熊美玲,吴毓东.江西省10254例乳腺癌普查资料分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2009,24(4):363-365. 被引量:14
  • 2SCHWARTZ G F, HORTOBAGYI, G N. Proceedings of the con- sensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the breast[J]. Cancer, 2004, 100:2512 -2532.
  • 3Bear HD, Anderson S, Beown A, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxrubi- cin and cyclophosphamide:preliminary result from National Surgi- cal Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Protocol B -27 [ J]. Clin Oncol, 2013,21 (22) :4165 -4174.
  • 4Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemothera- py:updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and BowelProject Protocols B - 18 and B - 27 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26 ( 5 ) : 778 - 785.
  • 5Smith IC, Heys SD, Huteheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemother- apy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetax- el. J Clin 0ncol,2012,20:1456 -1466.
  • 6Di6ras V, Fumoleau P, Romieu G, et al. Randomized parallel study of doxorubiein plus paelitaxel and doxorubicin plus eyclo- phosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cane- er[ J ]. J Clin Onco1,2004 ,22 :4958 - 4965.
  • 7Cersosimo RJ, Hong WK. Epirubicin : a review of the pharmacolo- gy, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin analogue[ J]. J Clin Oncol,2012,24:2125 - 2139.
  • 8Goldhirseh A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2011,22 ( 8 ) : 1736 - 1747.
  • 9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response eval- uation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (ver- sion 1,1 ) [ J]. Eur J Cancer 2009,45:228 -47.
  • 10van der Hage JA, van de Velde C J, Julien JP, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2011,19:4224 - 4237.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Garces CA,Cance WG. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer[J].American Surgeon,2004,(07):565-569.
  • 2Mamounes EP,Wang J,Bryant J. Patterns of locoregional failure (LRF) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC):results from NSABP-18[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2003,(Supple1):17-23.
  • 3Co11eoni M,OrvietoE,Nolé F. Predictionof response to primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer[J].European Journal of Cancer,1999,(04):574-579.
  • 4Gregory RK,Powles TJ,Salter J. Prugnostic relevance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2000,(02):171-175.
  • 5Zhang F,Yang Y,Smith T. Correlation between HER-2 expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil,doxorubicin,and cyclophosphamid in patients with breast carcinoma[J].Cancer,2003,(07):1758-1765.
  • 6Taucher S,Rudas M,Mader RM. Influence of neoadjuvant therapy with epirubicin and docetaxel on the expression of HER2/neu in patients with breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2003,(03):207-213.
  • 7Euler U,Tulusan AH. An attempt to identify biological markers predicting response to primary chemotherapy with epirubiein/cyclophosphamid in locally advance breast cancer[A].
  • 8Pohl G,Rudas M,Taucher S. Expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in breast carcinomas before and after preoperative chemotherapy[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2003,(01):97-103.
  • 9Davis DW,Buchholz TA,Hess KR. Automated quantification of apoptosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer:early assessment predicts clinical response[J].Clinical Cancer Research,2003,(03):955-960.
  • 10Chintamani Singhal V,Singh JP,Lyall A. Is drug induced toxicity a good predictor of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer? a prospective clinical study[J].BMC Cancer,2004,(01):48-56.

共引文献30

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部