期刊文献+

“盖儒家本是孔教中之一门”——谭嗣同对孔教与儒家的区分及其意义

“This is One of the Door Cover of Confucian”in Confucianism——Tan Sitong on Confucianism and Confucian Distinction and Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "盖儒家本是孔教中之一门"表达了谭嗣同以孔教对中国本土文化的整合,同时厘定了孔教与儒家的关系。由于谭嗣同在以孔教包罗诸子百家的同时,明确指出儒家只是孔教中之一门,也就不可能像康有为那样以孔教为儒家代言。不仅如此,谭嗣同指责儒家败坏了孔教,从内部削弱了孔教的势力。因此,他对孔子与儒家分别对待。谭嗣同的"盖儒家本是孔教中之一门"昭示人们,抨击孔子者不可能是儒家,儒家应该推奉孔子。尽管如此,并不可以将推崇孔子与推崇儒家混为一谈。 'Confucian cover the Confucianism of' express Tan to Confucianism of Chinese native cultureintegration, and determined the relationship between Confucianism and Confucian. As a result of TanSitong in Confucianism include philosophers, clearly pointed out that Confucianism was only door inConfucianism, it is impossible to like Kang Youwei as to Confucianism Confucian endorsement. Not onlythat, Tan Sitong accused the corrupt Confucian Confucianism, Confucianism weakened from internal forces.Therefore, he treats Kong Zi and Confucianism respectively. Tan's'Confucian cover the Confucianism of'declare publicly people, criticized Confucius cannot be Confucian, Confucianism should push BongConfucius. In spite of this, it is not to be regarded as one of the Kong Zi and the Confucian school, ifthe Kong Zi and the Confucian view, they will not be respected by Kong Zi and become the confucian.
作者 魏义霞
出处 《河南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期64-71,123,共8页 Henan Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目()
关键词 谭嗣同 孔教 儒家 Tan Sitong Confucian Confucianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1康有为.万木草堂口说·学术源流[A].康有为全集(二)[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007、.
  • 2谭嗣同.仁学[A].谭嗣同全集[C].北京:中华书局,1998.
  • 3谭嗣同.与唐绂丞书[A].谭嗣同全集[M].北京:中华书局,1998.
  • 4谭嗣同.上欧阳中鹄十[A].谭嗣同全集[C].北京:中华书局,1998.464.
  • 5梁启超.读《孟子》界说[A].梁启超全集(第1册)[C].北京:北京出版社,1999.159.
  • 6梁启超.清代学术概论[A]..梁启超全集:第五册[M].北京:北京出版社,1999..
  • 7谭嗣同.论今日西学与中国古学[A].谭嗣同全集[C].北京:中华书局,1998.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部