认知二维语义学与克里普克理论之关系探析

Analysis of the Relation Between Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics and Kripke's Theories

查莫斯宣称,他的认知二维语义学承认克里普克的模态与意义理论,并分别从模态论证与认知论证两个方面论述了这一点。但是,认知二维语义学诉诸模态理性主义一元论,而该理论违背了克里普克对认知模态与形而上模态的划分;并且,如果认知内涵框架可以整合指称的因果机制,那么,认知内涵就应当是一种元语义成分。因此,认知二维语义学并未真正地完全接受克里普克的模态与意义理论。

Chalmers claimed that his epistemic two-dimensional semantics admitted Kripke＇s theories of modality and meaning, and argued for this from modal argument and epistemic argument respectively. However, what the epistemic two-dimensional semantics invokes to is modal rationalism monism, which violates the distinction between epistemic modality and metaphysical modality made by Kripke; and, if epistemic intension can integrate the causal mechanism of reference, then it will be metasemantical component. Therefore, it is not that epistemic two-dimensional semantics admits the theories of modality and meaning of Krioke really and comoletelv.