团队认知多样性如何影响团队创造力:一个有调节的中介模型被引量：5

How Team Cognitive Diversity Influences Team Creativity: a Moderated Mediation Model

下载PDF

导出

摘要实证研究团队认知多样性对团队创造力的影响并检验团队反思和团队氛围在以上关系中所起的中介作用和调节作用。研究结果表明,(1)团队认知多样性对团队创造力有显著的正向影响;(2)团队反思在团队认知多样性和团队创造力之间发挥部分中介作用;(3)团队信任和开放性调节着团队认知多样性和团队反思之间的关系,但是团队认同的调节作用不成立。 Because the team form prevails, team diversity has aroused widespread concern, but the existing literature rare- ly pay attention to the positive effect of team cognitive diversity and team results. This paper empirically studies how team cognitive diversity influences team creativity, and tests the mediating role of team reflexivity and moderating role of team cli- mate. The results showed that：（1） team cognitive diversity has a significant positive effect on team creativity; （2） team reflexivity plays a partial mediating role between team cognitive diversity and team creativity; （ 3 ） the team trust and open- ness both moderate the relationship of team cognitive diversity and team reflexivity, but team identification doesn＇ t moder- ate the relationship of team cognitive diversity and team reflexivity. And if the degree of team openness is stronger, the me- diation effect of team reflexivity will be enhanced.

作者陈星汶崔勋于桂兰

机构地区南开大学商学院吉林大学商学院

出处《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第19期112-118,共7页 Science and Technology Management Research

基金教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"我国人力资源多样化对企业有效性的影响路径研究"(12JYA630021)

关键词团队认知多样性团队创造力团队反思团队氛围拔靴法 team cognitive diversity team creativity team reflexivity team climate bootstrapping

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1阿吉斯.人力资源管理译丛:绩效管理[M].刘昕,曹仰锋,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:263.
2JACKSON S E. Team composition in organizational setting: Issues in managing an increasing diverse work force [ C ]. //WORCHEL S, WOOD W, SIMPON J A. ( Eds. ). Group Process and Productivi- ty. NewburyPark. CA: Sage, 1992:136-180.
3WLIIIAMS K Y, O REILLY C A. Demography and diversity in or- ganizations: A review of 40 years of research [ J]. Research in Or- ganizational Behavior, 1998, 20 : 77 - 140.
4VAN K D, DE DREU C W, HOMAN A C. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89 (6) : 1008 -1022.
5MEYER B, SCHOLL W. Complex problem solving after unstructured discussion: Effect of information distribution and experience [ J ]. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 2009, 12 (4) : 495 -515.
6KILDUFF M, ANGELMAR R, MEHRA A. Top management team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions [J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11 (1): 21-34.
7BANTEL K A, JACKSON S E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top, team make a difference? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10 (s1): 107-124.
8CARNEVALE P J, PROBST T M. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization [ J ]. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74 (5) : 1300 -1309.
9JEHN K A, NORTHCRAFT G B, NEALE M A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and perform- ance in workgroups [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44 (4): 741-763.
10VAN K D, SCHIPPERS M C. Work group diversity [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2007 (58): 515-541.