战后70年两岸抗日历史认知的差异及对文学创作与研究的影响

The Influence of the Cognitive Differences of Cross-strait Counter-Japanese History from 1945 to 2015 on Literary Creation and Studies

战后70年,大陆对抗战历史的认知走过了一条由偏颇到客观的路程,但基于全社会对抗日历史始终如一高度一致的肯定,这条认知之路总体上线索分明。大陆的抗日文学创作和研究也因此始终兴盛。台湾对于抗日历史的认知显得路程曲折变化多端,"解严"之前,遵循的是国民党的正统历史观,抗日文学创作和研究曾经繁荣。近二三十年,由于本土势力的日渐强势,台湾文坛几被本土文学论者独霸,在媚日反中的喧嚣声中,无论是反映日本殖民统治台湾历史的"抗日"文学,还是表现国民党人在大陆奋战八年的"抗战"文学,都已销声匿迹。

Since 1945,mainland writers' cognition of Counter-Japanese history changes from bias to objectivity. The society at large positively confirms the history of Counter-Japanese history with a high degree of consensus. Their route of cognition has a clear clue in its change. Thereby,the literary creation and studies of Counter-Japanese in mainland boom all the time. While Taiwan Residents writers' attitudes towards Counter-Japanese history are complicated and changeable. Before the end of Martial Law Period,they follow orthodoxy of Kuomintang history,and literary creation and studies of Counter-Japanese flourished once. However,in the past 20 to 30 years,the literary world has been dominated by local literary writers due to the increasing influence of local powers. In the chaos of fawning on Japanese and resisting China,both Counter-Japanese literature reflecting the history in which Japanese colonized and ruled Taiwan,and Counter-Japanese literature representing Kuomintang's fight for eight years in mainland disappear.