期刊文献+

MOOC质量保证体系研究 被引量:82

Towards a MOOC Quality Assurance Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,MOOC的普及引发了社会对其质量的广泛关注,国外虽有学者对MOOC质量和评价做了一些研究,但主要集中于评估原则和零散的具体措施,在课程质量保证方面缺乏系统性研究,而且对预防性质量措施讨论尚不充分。鉴于在线课程质量的相关研究已比较成熟,本文通过对国内外八个权威在线课程评价指标的分析,归纳出一般在线课程的质量因子;然后结合MOOC的特殊性确立适合MOOC的质量观,并以美国在线课程质量量规(Quality Matters Rubric)为蓝本构建MOOC质量模型。文章最后结合国内外MOOC建设的案例和优秀实践,从媒体技术、课程内容、课程管理三方面讨论实际工作中可具体应用的质量措施,形成较为完整的质量保证体系,可作为MOOC建设和质量管理的参考。 In recent years, the popularity of MOOCs has drawn attention of researchers about the quality of the cour- ses. Oversea scholars have done research on the quality assurance and evaluation methods for MOOC, including the underlying dimension of the MOOC quality, the methods to improve the quality of MOOCs , and implementation of the quality assurance procedure. However, existing research studies mainly focus on assessment principles and partial spe- cific measures and there is a lack of a systematic investigation and preventive measures on the quality assurance. Given that the quality assurance of e-learning is relatively mature, the authors analyzed eight well-known Chinese and over- sea online course rubrics and established 15 type quality factors. Then, taking the features of MOOCs into considera- tion, the authors created a MOOC quality model with reference to the Quality Matters Rubric. Finally, we discussed several specific measures from three aspects ( media technology, learning contents and course management ) based on the research of a wide range of case studies and best practices related to MOOC development in and outside of China. All these measures can be applied to guide the development and quality control of MOOCs as well as to increase the sat- isfaction level of learners and stakeholders.
作者 李青 刘娜
出处 《开放教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期66-73,共8页 Open Education Research
基金 北京邮电大学2014年继续教育教改项目"MOOC课程建设规范及质量保障机制研究"
关键词 MOOC 质量保证 质量评价 课程开发 MOOC quality assurance quality assessment course development
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1陈刚,张建伟,李海霞.高校网络课程实施质量的评价标准[J].清华大学教育研究,2003,24(5):97-102. 被引量:34
  • 2Conole, G. (2013 ). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strate- gies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs [ EB! OL]. [ 2014-10-26 ]. http ://www. um. es/ead/red/39/conole, pdf.
  • 3Creelman, A., Ehlers, U. D., & Ossiannilsson, E. S. (2014). Perspectives on MOOC quality-An account of the EFQUEL MOOC quality project [ EB/OL]. [ 2015 -2-18 ]. http ://papers. efquel. org/index, php/innoqual/article/viewFile/163/49.
  • 4Danid, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility[ EB/OL]. [2015-2-22]. ht- tp ://jime. open. ac. uk/articles/lO. 5334/2012-18/.
  • 5丹尼斯·克伯蒂克(2005).远程教育的质量保证[M].候建军译.北京:中央广播大学出版社:18-19.
  • 6Davis, H, (2014). Making MOOCs and the role of the librari-an[ EB/OL]. [ 2014-09-26 ]. http ://www. bibsyskonferansen, no/files/ 2014/03/Making- MOOCs-and -the-role-of-the - Librarian. pdf.
  • 7Downes, S. (2013). The quality of massive open online cour- ses[ EB/OL]. [2015-03-06]. http://cdn, efquel, org/wp-content/ blogs, dir/7/files/2013/05/week2- The - quality- of - massive - open- on- line-courses-StephenDownes, pdf.
  • 8Eaton, J. S. (2012). MOOCs and accreditation:Focus on the quality of "direct-to- students" education [ EB/OL ]. [ 2015 - 03 - 12 ]. http://www, mcca. org/uploads/fckeditor/file/MOOCs% 20and% 20Accreditation. docx.
  • 9Fayetteville State University ( 2010 ). Online course evaluation rubric [ EB/OL]. [ 2015 - 04 - 24 ]. http://www, uncfsu, edu/docu- ments/onlineeducatian/pdf/QA_Evaluation_Rubric, docx.
  • 10Fernandez, M. B. R., Silvera, J. L. S., & Meneses, E. L. (2015). Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181 : 2012[ EB/OL]. [2015-05-20]. ht- tp ://www. artnodes, org/index, php/rusc/article/view/v 12 nl - ramirez - salmeron-lopez/2470.

二级参考文献7

共引文献35

同被引文献917

引证文献82

二级引证文献664

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部