期刊文献+

新疆艾比湖湿地土壤有机碳含量的光谱测定方法对比 被引量:21

Comparative assessment of two methods for estimation of soil organic carbon content by Vis-NIR spectra in Xinjiang Ebinur Lake Wetland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 干旱半干旱地区湿地土壤中的有机碳是影响土壤质量,制约植物生长的重要因素之一,其含量的变化会影响生态系统的安全和稳定。为快速估测湿地土壤有机碳含量,在新疆艾比湖湿地保护区采集140个荒漠土壤样品,利用土壤可见/近红外光谱数据以及化学分析获取的土壤有机碳数据,在对土壤原始光谱反射率进行卷积平滑的基础上,获取了一阶微分、倒数对数一阶微分2种光谱预处理指标,采用蚁群-区间偏最小二乘法、基于支持向量机的回归特征消去法,选择土壤有机碳含量近红外光谱特征波长,在此基础上构建土壤有机碳含量偏最小二乘回归、支持向量回归模型。结果表明:1)利用原始一阶微分建立的模型,预测能力优于倒数对数一阶微分建立的模型。2)4种建模结果比较显示,利用原始一阶微分经基于支持向量机的回归特征消去法进行特征变量选择后建立的土壤有机碳含量模型,预测精度最高。训练集的相关系数以及均方根误差分别为0.9687、0.158%;测试集的相关系数和均方根误差分别为0.9091以及0.268%。因此,经过卷积平滑以及一阶微分预处理、并利用基于支持向量机的回归特征消去法建立的模型具有较高的预测精度和较好的稳健性,可以作为有效手段估算荒漠湿地土壤有机碳含量。 Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a critical soil property that has profound impact on soil quality and plant growth. It is involved in soil structural formation and atmospheric carbon sequestration. This is especially true in the arid and semi-arid regions. Accurately detecting SOC is an important issue. Traditionally, SOC is limited to laboratory determination using the techniques such as wet or dry combustion, ion sensing electrodes, loss on ignition, or via chemical assays. Yet those traditional approaches often involve expensive testing materials, time-consuming sample preparation and production of excessive environmental pollutants. An approach which can quantify SOC content with time and cost savings is needed. With 140 soil samples acquired from the Ebinur Lake wetland protection area in Xinjiang, China, this research attempts to apply 2 algorithms in hyperspectral data mining, namely, the ant colony optimization – interval partial least squares (ACO-iPLS) and recursive feature elimination – support vector machine (SVM-RFE) to improve the estimation accuracy of SOC content using the visible and near-infrared (VIS/NIR) spectroscopy of soils (350-2500 nm) in laboratory. After convolution smoothing (S-G), 2 common spectra pre-processing methods, namely, first order differential and first order differential of the logarithm of inverse, are applied in the hyperspectral data to extract the feature wavelengths. Results indicate that the feature wavelengths pertaining to SOC mainly are located within 1786-1929 nm with ACO-iPLS and 745-910, 1677, 1755, and 1911-2254 nm with SVM-RFE. With the extracted feature wavelengths, the ensuing models with the same 2 approaches are established with the half of the samples (70 soil samples) as training set and the other half (70 soil samples) as testing set. The results show that the spectra processed with the combination of the S-G and first order with reflectance perform much better than the logarithm of first order differential of the logarithm of inverse after the S-G. Compared to the linear model used commonly, i.e. ACO-iPLS, the nonlinear model SVM-RFE pre-processed with first order differential with reflectance produces the higher estimation accuracy. The root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) for the SVM-RFE approach are respectively 0.158% and 0.268% in the training and testing set. The correlation coefficient of cross validation (Rcv) and the correlation coefficient of prediction (Rp) are 0.9687 and 0.9091, respectively. The relative prediction deviation (RPD) of testing set is 2.41. The RMSECV and RMSEP for the ACO-iPLS approach are respectively 0.329% and 0.396% in the training and testing set. The Rcv and Rp are 0.8647 and 0.8297, respectively. The RPD of the testing set is 1.63. The SVM-RFE approach pre-processed with first order differential of the logarithm of inverse produces the higher estimation accuracy than the ACO-iPLS. The RMSECV and RMSEP for the SVM-RFE approach are 0.033% and 0.448%, respectively. The Rcv and Rp are 0.9989 and 0.8111, respectively. The RPD of testing set is 1.44. The RMSECV and RMSEP for the ACO-iPLS approach are 0.496% and 0.586%, respectively. The Rcv and Rp are 0.7293 and 0.586, respectively. The RPD of the testing set is 1.10. Over all, the good performance of the SVM model can be ascribed to its good capability of dealing with non-linear and hierarchical relationship between SOC and feature wavelengths. The results are fairly satisfactory. This practice provides an efficient, low-cost, potentially highly accurate approach to estimate SOC content and hence support better management and protection strategies for desert wetland ecosystems. The next step is to attempt to apply VIS/NIR spectroscopy technique in the field for further research.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第18期162-168,共7页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1303381 41261090 41130531) 新疆大学优秀博士研究生创新项目(XJUBSCX-2012026)
关键词 土壤 遥感 回归 艾比湖湿地 soils remote sensing regression analysis Ebinur Lake wetland
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1徐欢欢,曾从盛,王维奇,翟继红.艾比湖湿地土壤有机碳垂直分布特征及其影响因子分析[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,26(5):86-91. 被引量:37
  • 2IPCC (International Panel of Climate Change). Land use, land-use change, and forestry[R]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 3Wang D D, Chakraborty S, Weindorf D C, et al. Synthesized use of VisNIR DRS and PXRF for soil characterization:Total carbon and total nitrogen[J]. Geoderma, 2015(243/244) 157--167.
  • 4Zhao Ruifeng, Chen Yaning, Zhou Huarong, et al. Assessment of wetland frag-mentation in the Tarim River basin, western China[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009, 57(2): 455--464.
  • 5Stevens A, Udelhoven T, Denis A, et al. Measuring soil organic carbon in croplands at regional scale using airborne imaging spectroscopy[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158(1/2): 32--45.
  • 6Vohland M, Besold J, Hill J, et al. Comparing different multivariate calibration methods for the determination of soil organic carbon pools with visible to near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Geoderma, 2011, 166(1 ): 198 -- 205.
  • 7Logninow W, Wisniewski W, Strony W, et al. Fractionation of organic carbon based on susceptibility to oxidation[J]. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 1987, 20(1): 47--52.
  • 8Polglase P J, Jokela E J, Comerford N B. Phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon fractions in litter and soil of southern Pine Plantations[J]. Soilence Society of America Journal, 1992, 56(2): 566--572.
  • 9Kinoshita R, Moebius-Clune B N, van Es H M, et al. Strategies for soil quality assessment using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy in a western Kenya chronosequenee[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 76(5): 1776-- 1788.
  • 10Summers D, Lewis M, Ostendorf B, et al. Visible near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a predictive indicator of soil properties[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011, 11(1): 123-- 131.

二级参考文献137

共引文献257

同被引文献337

引证文献21

二级引证文献239

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部