期刊文献+

刑法解释论立场的反思 被引量:1

Reflection on the Position of the Interpretation of Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 任何事物都是形式与本质的统一体,《刑法》法条也不例外,因此,对《刑法》法条的解释应当兼顾形式解释与实质解释。形式解释论与实质解释论分别在某些方面的不当入罪倾向成为互相攻击的把柄。应当界定:"对法条的解释应当以形式解释为主,辅以实质解释。"形式解释忠诚于罪状的一般含义,其功能在于划定犯罪圈的最外围,防止刑罚的处罚超出国民的一般预测可能性;实质解释的功能在于出罪,限缩犯罪圈,实质遵守罪刑法定主义精神;而扩大解释运用的任务应当由"有效解释"即立法解释、司法解释来完成。 Anything is the unity of form and essence,"Criminal law" is not exceptional, therefore, the interpretation of "criminal law" law should take into account the formal interpretation and substantive interpretation.Interpretation on form and interpretation on substance respectively the tendency of improper into sin become mutual attack handle in some aspect.Should be defined:Law interpretation should be based on form explanation, supplemented by substantial explanation.Form explanation is always loyal to the general meaning,its function is limit the scope of the crime,prevent penalty punishment surpass the average forecast possibility of national.Substantive interpretation function is limiting criminal circle,abide by the principle of legality.The task of expanding interpretation should be composed of effective interpretation.
作者 刘杰
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2015年第4期126-129,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 刑法解需论 立场 实质解释论 形式解释论 Theft Crime of fraud Crime of unlawful intrusion into the dwelling house Interpretation on substance Formal interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献81

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部