环境规制、引致R&D与全要素生产率被引量：5

Environmental regulations,induced R&D and productivity

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用2000-2011中国省级单位面板数据,分析了环境规制对技术创新、由环境规制引致的技术创新对全要素生产率及环境规制对全要素生产率的影响。结果显示:环境规制提升了中国技术创新水平,"波特假说"在中国成立。较之"废气"、"固废",工业"废水"治理投资对中国技术创新推动最大;较之由环境规制直接引致的R&D投入对全要素生产率的影响,由非环境规制引致的R&D对全要素生产率的影响更大;滞后两期的环境规制对全要素生产率的推动作用小于滞后一期,"波特假说"在中国具有时间约束性。 Using the data of provincial units of China from 2000 -2011, this paper empirically analyzes the impacts of environmental regulations on technological innovation, the impacts of technological innovation induced by environmental regulations on total factor productivity（TFP） and the direct impacts of environmental regulations on total factor productivity. Empirical results show that the environmental regulations have enhanced the level of technological innovation in China, ＂Porter Hypothesis＂ establishes in China. Compared with wasted gas and wastes, industrial wasted water abatement investment promotes China＇ s technological innovation most; the impacts of R＆D expenditure induced by non-environmental regulations on total factor productivity（TFP） is greater than that by environmental regulations; the impacts of two-year lag environmental regulations on total factor productivity （TFP） is weaker than that of one-year lag, ＂Porter Hypothesis＂ has time constraint in China.

作者赵红谷庆

机构地区重庆大学经济与工商管理学院重庆大学公共管理学院

出处《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期23-34,共12页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基金重庆市社会科学基金项目"直辖十五年重庆外贸出口增长方式变迁及十二五时期稳定出口政策研究"(2012YBJJ022)

关键词环境规制引致R&D 全要素生产率 “波特假说” environmental regulations technological innovation TFP ＂Porter Hypothesis＂

分类号 F205 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献70

1EDERINGTON J, LEVINSON A, MINIERJ. Footloose and pollution-free [ J ]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005,87 (1) :92 -99.
2QUIROGA M,STENER T, PERSSON M. Have countries with lax environmental regulations a comparative advantage in polluting industries? [ R ]. Working Papers 432 in Economics Grteborg University, Department of Economics ,2009.
3PORTER M, LINDE C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Relationship [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9 (4) : 97 - 118.
4BERMAN E,BUI L T M. Environmental regulation and productivity:Evidence from oil refineries [ J ] Review of Economics and Statistics ,2001,88 (3) ;498 - 510.
5MANAGI S,OPALUCH J,JIN D,GRIGALUNAS T. Environmental regulations and technological change in the offshore oil and gas industry[ J]. Land Economics ,2005,81:303 -319.
6BRUNNERIMER S, COHEN M A. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [ J ]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management ,2003,45:278 -293.
7De VRIES F P, WITHAGEN C. Innovation and environmental stringency : The case of sulfur dioxide abatement [ R ]. Discussion Paper No. 2005 - 18. Center, Tilburg University,2005.
8DOMAZLICKY B R, WEBER W L. Does environmental protection lead to productivity growth in the chemical industry [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Ecomomices ,2004,28:301 - 324.
9HAMAMOTO M. Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries [ J ]. Resource and EnergyEconomies,2006,28 : 299 - 312.
10ARIMURE T H, HIBIKI A, JOHNSTONE N. An empirical study of environmental R&D: What encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative? [ M ]//JOHNSTONE N. Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing,2007 : 142 - 173.