期刊文献+

企业风险决定因素及风险收益关系研究 被引量:1

An empirical study on the risk-return correlation and determinants of strategic risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究基于2004-2012年中国电力、热力生产和供应业上市公司的财务数据,运用一个包含了风险、企业绩效、行业绩效、预期绩效水平和理想绩效水平的动态模型,对中国企业承担的风险的决定因素以及风险—收益关系进行实证检验。研究发现,企业绩效和过去的风险水平对企业风险有显著负向影响,而预期绩效水平和理想绩效水平对企业风险有显著正向影响,支持了公司行为理论关于战略风险—收益关系的因果论证。绩效低的公司会主动寻求较大的风险,绩效高的公司会规避风险,中国企业存在"鲍曼悖论"现象。 This research empirically tests for the strategic risk -return correlation and the determining factors of strategic risk in China. In this paper, the authors select listed companies in the electric power industry in China as the research sample and adopt a dynamic time series model including aspirations, expectations, industry performance, corporate performance and risk. The empirical findings indicate that aspirations and expectations both have a positive impact on risk taking, while enterprise performance and previous risk have a negative impact on risk taking. It supports Behavioral Theory in the Firm' s thesis about the causal relationship between strategic risk and return, namely low performance - high risk. A firm with low performance will seek greater risk and a firm with high performance will try to keep low risk. Bowman' s paradox also applies to China' s enterprises.
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期100-106,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 战略风险 绩效 公司行为理论 鲍曼悖论 strategic risk return contingent risk decision hypothesis Bowman Paradox
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1BOWMAN E H. A risk/return paradox for strategic management[ J]. Sloan Management Review, 1980, 21 (3) : 17 - 31.
  • 2BROMILEY P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance [ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991,34 (1) :37 -59.
  • 3祝志明,杨乃定,高婧.战略风险与收益:中国上市公司的实证研究[J].财经研究,2008,34(5):133-143. 被引量:9
  • 4曾进,刘勇.我国上市公司风险--回报的相关关系研究[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2008,23(2):99-103. 被引量:7
  • 5曾永艺,杨世杰,卢冰.“鲍曼悖论”及其理论解释--来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(5):91-98. 被引量:9
  • 6CYERT R M, MARCH J G. A behavioral theory of the firm[ M ]. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice -Hall, 1963.
  • 7RUEFLI T W, COLLINS J M, LACUGNA J R. Risk measures in strategic management research: Auld Lang Syne [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20 (2) : 167 - 194.
  • 8SINHA T. Prospect theory and risk return association: Another look [ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1994, 24:225 - 231.
  • 9ANDERSEN T J, DENRELL J, BET'FIS R A. Strategic responsiveness and Bowman' s risk - return paradox [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28 (4) :407 - 429.
  • 10FISHER I N, HALL G R. Risk and corporate rates of return [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1969, 83:79 -92.

二级参考文献73

共引文献22

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部