期刊文献+

CCS技术应用的环境侵权责任问题研究 被引量:2

Study on the environmental tort liability of CCS project
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CCS技术通过捕获、运输和封存等技术手段,可以大规模地减少电厂及工业生产中CO2的排放量,是可以选择的减缓气候变化的有效措施。但其运行的各个阶段有可能对环境造成一定的影响,运输和储存中CO2的大量泄漏甚至会带来不可逆转的生态灾难。对CCS技术应用的环境侵权责任问题进行研究的目的是希望通过法律的调节,最大可能地降低CCS技术实施对环境的影响,以最低的社会成本实现CCS减缓气候变化的社会效用,这也是目前CCS相关法律问题中最复杂的方面。研究发现:在美国普通法中,法官需要平衡CCS减缓气候变化的公共利益以及由于CO2泄漏而遭受损失的当事人的个人利益。在中国现有法律体系内,如果CCS项目中CO2泄漏造成了环境污染,损害赔偿除去归责原则和举证责任的分配外,很多因素都充满变数、无法确定。一旦CO2泄漏事故发生,当事人通过侵权诉讼获得赔偿救济存在难度。 CCS productions through technology can massively reduce the CO2 emissions of power plants and during industrial technical phases as capture, transportation and storage. It is an alternative and effective measure for slowing down climate change. However, all the technological phases may have some impact on environment. The CO2 leaked in the transportation and storage phases may, if in a large quantity, cause irreversible ecological disaster. The purpose of studying the environmental tort liability of CCS project is to minimize the impact of CCS on the environment through legal regulation and to slow down climate change with CCS technology with the minimum social cost, which is also the most complicated aspect in the legal questions related to CCS at present. The study found that judges need to balance the public interests brought by CCS slowing down climate change and the personal interests of the party involved damaged by the leaked COs under common law system of the United States. In China, if the environment is polluted by the leaked CO2 in the CCS project, there are many uncertainties in tort liability except for the doctrine of liability fixation and the distribution of burden of proof. Once an accident of CO2 leakage happened, it is still hard for the party involved to obtain compensation for damages by tort lawsuits .
作者 赵鑫鑫
机构地区 南京邮电大学
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期141-145,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 美国能源基金会"省级气候变化立法研究--以江苏省为例"(G-1205-16214)
关键词 CCS 美国普通法 侵权责任 损害赔偿 CCS US common law environmental tort liability compensation for damages
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1小詹姆斯.A.亨德森,理查德.N.皮尔森.美国侵权法——实体与程序[M].王竹,丁海俊,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
  • 2ANDERSON 0 L. Hemingway oil and gas law and taxation[ M]. 4th. Thomson West, 2004:29 -30.
  • 3丹尼尔.H.科尔.污染与财产权——环境保护的所有权制度比较研究[M].严厚福,王社坤,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:3.
  • 4WILSON E J, MARK A, FIGUEIREDO d. Geologic carbon dioxide sequestration: An analysis of subsurface property law [J]. Journal of Envtl. L. Rep. , 2006,36 : 114 - 121.
  • 5李政,许兆峰,张东杰,等.中国实施CO2捕集与封存的参考意见[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012.
  • 6ALEXANDRA B K, WILSON E J. Climate change and carbon sequestration: Accessing a liability regime for long-term storage of carbon dioxide[ J]. Emory Law Journal,2008,58 : 103 - 163.
  • 7伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.
  • 8文森特.美国侵权法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
  • 9KEETON W P. Prosser and keeton on the law of torts § 75[ M]. 5th. West Group, 1984:534.
  • 10ALEXANDRA B K. From reservoirs to remediation : The impact of CERCLA on common law strict llability cenvironmental claims [J]. Journal of Wake Forest L. Rev. , 2004,39:596-967.

共引文献8

同被引文献51

引证文献2

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部