期刊文献+

消费罪恶感:维度、过程及实证研究前沿探析 被引量:1

Consumer Guilt: The Frontier Analysis of Dimension, Process and Empirical Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 消费罪恶感是消费者因购买行为违反社会规范或个人价值观所产生的负面情绪,它是一柄双刃剑,企业或营销者运用不当会降低消费者再购意愿和顾客忠诚,运用得当则可通过广告情感诉求实现营销目的。从消费罪恶感的理论基础:情绪维度、发生时机和类型出发,解析了消费罪恶感从引发到消弭的整个过程,最后介绍了消费罪恶感的影响因素、适用情境、混合情绪等相关实证研究。未来研究方向应对虚拟环境下消费罪恶感、罪恶感强度、调节变量和实证研究方法等做进一步的完善和拓展。 Consumer guilt is defined as the consumer's negative feeling when breaking the social norms or violating personal values. Consumer guilt is a double-edged sword for the enterprises. Being used improperly, it will have negative effects on the repurchase intention and loyalty of the consumers. The enterprise also can achieve its marketing objectives through the advertisement emotional appeal by using the consumer guilt properly. The paper first introduces the theoretical basis of consumer guilt including emotional dimensions, timing and types, and then analyzes the process of consumer guilt from its initiation to elimination. Finally the empirical studies of influencing factors of eliminating the consumer guilt, its applicable context and mixed emotions were clarified. The future studies were necessary to explore the consumer guilt in virtual environment, intensity of guilt, the moderators and empirical research methods.
机构地区 安徽大学商学院
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1818-1829,共12页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"中国消费者自我赠礼动机及行为研究"(11YJC630002)
关键词 消费罪恶感 情绪维度 影响因素 适应情境 广告诉求 consumer guilt emotion dimensions influencing factors applicable context advertisement appeal
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1捧奄鼬.℃2007).消费罪恶感之情绪内涵、发生时机及量表研发(博士学位论文).台湾政治大学,台北.
  • 2Agrawal, N., &Duhachek, A.(2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: a defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 263-273.
  • 3Armstrong-Soule, C., Koppenhafer, L., & Madrigal, R. (2013). Why do you think they do that? Consumer elaboration in the detection of manipulative intent and its consequences on product judgments. Advances in Consumer Research, 41, 139-140.
  • 4Aybat, O. Y., & Kramer, T. (2010). The liberating effect of guilt sharing on consumers' preference for indulgence. Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 754-755.
  • 5Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. R., & Basil, M. B. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology and Marketing, 25, 1-23.
  • 6Becheur, I., Dib, H., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florenee, P. (2008). Emotions of fear, guilt or shame in anti-alcohol messages: Measuring direct effects on persuasion and the moderating role of sensation seeking. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 99.
  • 7Bei, L. T., Lin, Y. T., & Yu, C. M. (2007). The relationship between consumer guilt and shopping behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 405-408.
  • 8Boudewyns, V., Turner, M. M., & Paquin, R. S. (2013).Shame-free guilt appeals: Testing the emotional and cognitive effects of shame and guilt appeals. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 811-825.
  • 9Burnett, M. S., & Lunsford, D. A. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33-43.
  • 10Chang, C. T., & Chen, T. T. (2010). Guilt appeals in cause-related advertising: When does a guilt appeal backfire?. Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 522-523.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部