期刊文献+

环境污染群体性事件的扩展式演化博弈模型 被引量:2

Extensive Evolutionary Game Model of Environmental Pollution Mass Incident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来全国各地频发的环境污染群体性事件严重影响到社会稳定。考虑化工企业立项决策与周边居民抗议行动的斯塔克伯格博弈,构建了环境污染群体性事件的扩展式演化博弈模型。由于扩展式演化博弈均衡求解的困难,考虑参与者的心智模型后简化了求解过程。比较怀特流形演化解和心智模型演化解,研究发现,两种演化解均反映博弈双方在稳定状态下的策略选择,但是心智模型演化解更贴近于实际情况。最后,结合大连福佳大化PX事件案例,比较了怀特流形演化解和心智模型演化解的均衡求解结果。 Environmental pollution mass incidents often occurring all over the country have seriously influenced the social stability. Considering the Stackberg game model between petrochemical enterprises and nearby residents, the paper builds the extensive evolutionary game model of environmental pollution mass incident. Because of the difficulty to solve the equilibrium of extensive evolutionary game, the player's mental model is considered that can simplify the solving course. Comparing the Wright Manifold evolutionary solution to the Mental Model evolutionary solution of the model, the results show that two solutions of evolutionary equilibrium can all reflect the strategy selection under the equilibrium state. However, the Mental Model evolutionary solution more closes to the fact. Lastly, based on the Dalian PX incident, the paper analyzes the two types of equilibrium outcomes of the Wright Manifold evolutionary solution to the Mental Model evolutionary solution.
机构地区 东北财经大学
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2015年第5期25-31,36,共8页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71171035 71271045) 东北财经大学学科建设支持计划特色学科项目(XKT-201411) 东北财经大学科研创新团队培育与扶持计划项目(DUFE2015GY03)
关键词 环境污染群体性事件 演化博弈 扩展式博弈 怀特流形 心智模型 environmental pollution mass incident evolutionary game extensive game Wright Manifold Mental Mod
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献197

共引文献277

同被引文献47

  • 1Kerstena A.,Sidky M.Re-aligning Rationality:Crisis Management and Prisoner Abuse in Iraq[J].Public Relations Review,2005,31(4):471-478.
  • 2Scanlan L.H.Public Relations in Crisis and Disaster[J].Public Relations Review,1999,25(2):251-252.
  • 3O'Hare M. "Not on My Block You Don't":Facility Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation[J].Public Policy,1977,25(4):407-458.
  • 4Peelle E.,Ellis R.Beyond the 'Not-in-My-Backyard' Impasse[C].Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy,1987.
  • 5Keohane N.O.,Zeckhauser R.J.The Ecology of Terror Defense[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2003,26(2):201-229.
  • 6Green K.C.Forecasting Decisions in Confiict Situations:A Comparison of Game Theory,Role-playing,and Unaided Judgement[J].International Journal of Forecasting,2002,18(3):321-344.
  • 7Pinker E.J.An Analysis of Short-Term Responses to Threats of Terrorism[J].Management Science,2007,53(6):865-880.
  • 8Aflaki A.,Pedraza-Martinez A.J.Humanitarian Funding in a Multi-Donor Market with Donation Uncertainty[J].Production and Operations Management,2016,25(7):1274-1291.
  • 9Natarajan K.V.,Swaminathan J.M.Inventory Management in Humanitarian Operations:Impact of Amount,Schedule,and Uncertainty in Funding[J].Manufacturing&Service Operations Management,2014,16(4):595-603.
  • 10杨春贵.正确处理群体性事件等人民内部矛盾[N].学习时报,2007-7-5(2).

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部