期刊文献+

剖宫产术后不同时期子宫瘢痕愈合的临床观察及其与胶原表达水平的关系 被引量:14

Clinical Observation of Uterine Scar Healing in Different Period after Cesarean Section and the Relationship with the Level of Collagen Expression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨剖官产术后瘢痕子宫在不同时期的愈合变化过程,及其与胶原表达水平的关系。方法选取250例瘢痕子宫再次行剖宫产的产妇为研究组,另取10例初次剖宫产产妇为对照组。分别取子宫瘢痕组织与子宫下段正常组织行免疫组化染色、检测。根据剖宫产术中肉眼所见子宫瘢痕肌层的厚度分为子宫下段完整组(A组)、子宫下段变薄组(B组)和子宫下段破裂组(c组)。将产妇按照本次妊娠与上次剖宫产间隔时间分成6组,〈2年组,2—4年组,4—6吗:组,608年组,8~10年组和≥10年组。分析子宫瘢痕肌层愈合与剖宫产间隔时间的关系,观察子宫瘢痕肌层组织Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原在不同时期的表达,并将免疫组化染色结果根据着色程魔襁阳性细胞率进行评分。结果研究组2~4年组_发生子宫肌层菲薄率、破裂率低于〈2年组、4—6年组、6—8年组、8—10年组、≥10年组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。研究组2—4年组产妇子宫瘢痕肌层的Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原评分与对照组比较,差异没有统计学意义(P〉0.05),其他5个时期组与对照组相比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论在2年内及4年以上再次妊娠会增加子宫破裂的概率,距上次剖宫产间隔时间2—4年是子宫瘢痕肌层修复愈合的最佳时间,此时Ⅰ、Ⅲ型胶原在子宫瘢痕肌层组织中的表达与正常子宫肌层组织表达相比差异无统计学意义,建议在此时间段内行二次妊娠,可以将二次妊娠风险降至最低。 Objective To study the healing process of scar uterus in different period after cesarean section, and its relationship with the level of expression of collagen. Methods Two hundred and fifty cases of uterine scar with cesarean section again were enrolled as the study group, while 10 cases of primary cesarean section as the control group. The uterus scar tissue and the lower uterine segment of normal tissue were taken and immunohistochemieal staining were detected. According to the muscle layer thickness of uterine scar, the complete lower uterine segment was subjected to group A, the thinning lower uterine segment was subjected to group B, the rupture lower uterine segment was subjected to C. According to the interval from the previous cesarean section, six groups were divided: 〈 2 years group, 2 -4 year group, 4 -6 year group, 6 - 8 year group,,8 - 10 year group, and ≥ 10 years group in order to study the relationship between uefine scar healing and cesarean interval. The Ⅰ, Ⅲ collagen expression in different periods were observed. According to the degree of col, oration, the immunohistochemical staining results and positive cells were scored. Results Myometrium meager rate, rupture rate in 2 -year group patients was less than 〈 2 years group, 4 - 6 year group, 6 - 8 year group, 8 - 10 years group, and ≥ 10 years group and, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 001 ). The comparison between Ⅰ, Ⅲ collagen rating in uterus scar myometrium with 2 -4 year group and the control group showed that there were no statistically significant differences P 〉 0.05). The comparison between five other periods group and the control group showed that the differences were statistical significant (P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion The probabil- ity of uterus rupture will increase if pregnancy occurred again in 2 years or more than 4 years. From the last cesarean 2 - 4 years is the best time to repair the muscle of the uterus scar healing, at this time, Ⅰ , Ⅲ collagen expression in uterine myometrium scar tissue and normal myometrium were not statistically significant difference. If patients underwent secondary pregnancy during this period, the second pregnancy risks can be minimized.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2015年第9期118-121,共4页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 子宫瘢痕愈合 胶原 免疫组化 Uterine scar healing Collagen Immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献190

共引文献862

同被引文献122

  • 1高萍.扣线皮内缝合应用于剖宫产手术腹部横切口的美容效果研究[J].中国医疗美容,2014,4(3):49-50. 被引量:3
  • 2宋红芳,马乐,雷玲玲,李婷,王小燕,刘志成.兔子宫壁组织力学特性的实验研究[J].北京生物医学工程,2007,26(5):517-520. 被引量:4
  • 3LUMBIGANON P,LAOPAIBOON M,GLMEZOGLU A M,et al.Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia:the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08[J].The Lancet,2010,375(9713):490-499.
  • 4Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.SOGC clinical practice guidelines.Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth.Number 155(Replaces guideline Number147)[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2005,89(3):319-331.
  • 5TAHSEEN S,GRIFFITHS M.Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections(VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1and repeat(third)caesarean sections[J].BJOG:an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2010,117(1):5-19.
  • 6MARSHALL N E,FU Rongwei,GUISE J M.Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity:a systematic review[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2011,205(3):262.e1-262.e8.
  • 7HIBBARD J U,GILBERT S B,HAUTH J C,et al.Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery[J].Obstetrics&Gynecology,2006,108(1):125-133.
  • 8American College of Obstetricians,Gynecologists.Society for Maternal-Fetal medicine.obstetric care consensus no.1:safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J].Obstetrics&Gynecology,2014,123(3):693-711.
  • 9吴钟瑜,李慧东,张蕾.剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕处憩室的阴道超声诊断[J].中华妇产科杂志,2008,43(6):452-453. 被引量:48
  • 10郭英花,韩素慧.瘢痕子宫再次剖宫产的相关问题[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(25):3512-3515. 被引量:65

引证文献14

二级引证文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部