期刊文献+

自我—他人决策及得失框架对安于现状偏差的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究通过两个实验探讨自我—他人决策和得失框架对外源和内源的安于现状偏差的影响。实验结果表明,自我决策时存在外源的安于现状偏差,损失框架下存在内源的安于现状偏差。自我—他人决策对外源的安于现状有影响(即自我决策时比为他人决策时被试更倾向维持他人之前的选择或者由外部环境造成的默认选项),而得失框架对内源的安于现状有影响(即损失框架下比收益框架下被试更倾向维持自己之前的选择)。
出处 《鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2015年第5期79-83,共5页 Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1刘腾飞,徐富明,张军伟,蒋多,陈雪玲.安于现状偏差的心理机制、影响因素及应用启示[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(10):1636-1643. 被引量:12
  • 2Samuelson & Zeckhauser. Status Quo Bias in Deci-sion Making [ J ]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1988 ,(1).
  • 3Hsiuju Rebecca Yen & Shih-Chieh Chuang. Theeffect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo[ J].Original empirical research,2008 , (36).
  • 4Kahneman,D & Tversky, A. Prospect theory : An a-nalysis of decision underrisk[ J]. Econometrica, 1979, (47 ).
  • 5Kahneman, D. Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler. R. H. Theendowment effect,loss aversion,and status quo bias[ J]. Jour-nal of Economic Perspectives, 1991 ,(5).
  • 6Anderson, C. J. The psychology of doing nothing:Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2003 , ( 129).
  • 7庄锦英.关于成本沉没效应的实验研究[J].应用心理学,2005,11(1):41-44. 被引量:5
  • 8Brian, J. , Brianna, S. , Angela, F. & Peter, A. Amatter of perspective : Choosing for others differs from choo-sing for yourself in making treatment decisions[ J]. Journal ofGeneral Internal Medicine,2006, (21 ).
  • 9王重鸣,梁立.风险决策中动态框架效应研究[J].心理学报,1998,30(4):394-400. 被引量:30
  • 10De Martino, B.,Kumaran, D. Seymour, B. & Do-lan ,R. J. Frames, biases and rational decision making in thehuman brain[ J]. Science,2006,313(4).

二级参考文献76

  • 1何贵兵,梁社红,刘剑.风险偏好预测中的性别差异和框架效应[J].应用心理学,2002,8(4):19-23. 被引量:49
  • 2谢晓非,王晓田.成就动机与机会-威胁认知[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):192-199. 被引量:55
  • 3李劲松,王重鸣.风险偏好类型与风险判断模式的实验分析[J].人类工效学,1998,4(3):17-21. 被引量:18
  • 4何贵兵.决策任务特征对风险态度的影响[J].人类工效学,1996,2(2):12-16. 被引量:13
  • 5Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496-510.
  • 6Ganzach, Y., Karsahi, N. (1995). Message framing and buyer behaviour: A field experiment. Journal of Business Research, 32, 11-17.
  • 7Kahneman, D. (2000). Preface to choices, values, frames. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, Values and Frames (pp. ix-xvii). New York: Russell Sage Foundation & Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47,263-291.
  • 9Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
  • 10Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部