期刊文献+

基于系统保护规划的三江平原湿地保护网络体系优化 被引量:10

SCP( systematic conservation planning) optimization for a wetland conservation network system on Sanjiang Plain,China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 综合三江平原湿地不同层次、不同维度的生物多样性特征,在系统保护规划方法(Systematic Conservation Planning,SCP)框架下,以集水区为规划单元,计算研究区域不可替代性指数,确定高保护价值网络体系,通过保护空缺分析对现有保护网络进行优化,并评估优化体系的有效性。结果表明:三江平原湿地高保护价值区域的分布呈现沿河流分布的特点;现有保护区中湖泊和目标物种的保护状态比较好;保护网络体系优化后,沼泽湿地在保护网络中的比重由22.88%重增加到50%以上;河流湿地由16.20%增加到33.92%;地下水资源在现有保护网络中的比重非常低,仅为2.01%,优化后保护网络中保护比重增加到12.05%,因此在今后的保护区规划中,应该重视对地下水资源的保护和管理。另外本研究结合生态脆弱性对高保护价值的空缺设计3个情景方案,并根据生态威胁的种类和强度提出各优先保护方案的保护建议,为保护管理决策提供依据。 This study optimized an existing conservation network system using SCP and gap analysis while evaluating the effectiveness of the new system. The process of establishing high-value conservation networks took into account biodiversity features of different levels and dimensions in the Sanjiang Plain. The process also accounted for the irreplaceability of catchments,since these planning units fall under the framework of SCP. In the horizontal dimension, we had two conservation level objectives,one for the ecosystem level and one for the species level. Eight types of marsh wetland systems,all lake ecosystems, and high conservation value river wetland systems were selected as ecosystem level conservation surrogates. Thirteen endangered birds and four endangered mammals were selected as species level conservation surrogates. In the vertical dimension,we chose 3 effective underground water distribution areas. Ecosystem conservation targets were set based on ecological function value,rarity and threat trends. Species conservation targets were set based on level of endangerment,scope for survival,and population growth / decline trends. Protection targets were set for waterresources according to their runoff modulus and recharge modulus. SCP utilizes the key concept of irreplaceability,which is a measure,varying from zero to one,indicating the importance of an area( planning unit) for the achievement of regional conservation targets. A map of irreplaceability values is therefore a base map of conservation planning. Finally,we combined irreplaceability values with vulnerability factors( factors threatening the ecology of the region) to design different planning options.Results were as follows:( 1) High conservation value areas accounted for about 16% of the whole region and were generally distributed along river and lake ecosystems. Specifically,at headwater intersections,such as the intersection of the Heilongjiang and Wusulijiang,the junction of the Tongjiang and Fuyuan,the marsh wetlands between Fujin and Baoqing,the waterfront in Hulin,and the middle part of Luobei,the northeast Hegang,northeast of Yilan,and the south Muling.( 2) Lake ecosystems and target species were well-protected in existing conservation areas. They accounted for 83.90% and81.25% of the whole conservation network respectively. After the prioritization,these percentages increased only slightly to86.65% and 100%.( 3) Marsh,riverine and wetland ecosystem protection by the existing conservation network was less effective. Prioritization would afford an increase in marsh wetlands( from 22. 88% to more than 50%),riverine wetlands( from 16.20% to 33.92%),and underground water resources( from just 2.01% to 12.05%).( 4) Vulnerability analysis showed high vulnerability areas on the Sanjiang Plain were mainly distributed in Jiamusi,south of Hegang,north of Shuangyashan and Jixi,the middle of Huanan and Luobei,and the intersection of the Fujin and Suibin.The work detailed above indicates that future conservation planning must continue to preserve well-protected ecosystems and species and emphasizes the need for protection and management of marsh,riverine and wetland ecosystems,especially underground water resources. Quantification of resource irreplaceability and vulnerability were evaluated as a supplement to this future conservation planning. The authors combined irreplaceability and vulnerability indexes to propose three scenarios( the ecological value prioritized scenario,the rescue prioritized scenario and the economic avoidance prioritized scenario),and provide recommendations for decision-makers under each scenario in terms of ecological threats.This irreplaceability-based biodiversity conservation planning method integrates protected objects,conservation targets and contributions into one framework and expresses the information in a quantified form. Quantifications enables conservation planning and prioritizing work to be more scientific and better visualized,providing a feasible and effective framework for natural reserve network establishment and prioritization.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第19期6394-6404,共11页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(C030801) 黑龙江省基础青年基金项目(JC03-09)
关键词 三江平原湿地 系统保护规划 不可替代性 脆弱性 C-plan wetlands in Sanjiang Plain systematic conservation planning(SCP) irreplaceability vulnerability c-plan
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1蒋志刚.论中国自然保护区的面积上限[J].生态学报,2005,25(5):1205-1212. 被引量:58
  • 2Pressey R L, Johnson I R, Wilson P D. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1994, 3(3): 242-262.
  • 3Pimm S L, Ayres M, Balmford A, Branch G, Brandon K, Brooks T, Bustamante R, Costanza R, Cowling R, Curran L M, Dobson A, Farber S, da Fonseca G A B, Gascon C, Kitching R, McNeely J, Lovejoy T, Mittermeier R A, Myers N, Patz J A, Raffle B, Rapport D, Raven P, Roberts C, Rodriguez J P, Rylands A B, Tucker C, Safina C, Samper C, Stiassny M L J, Supriatna J, Wall D H, Wilcove D. Can we defy nature's end? Science, 2001, 293(5538) : 2207-2208.
  • 4Wilson K A, McBride M F, Bode M, Possingham H P. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature, 2006, 440(7082) : 337-340.
  • 5Powell G V N, Barborak J, RodrguezS M. Assessing representativeness of protected natural areas in Costa Rica for conserving biodiversity: A preliminary gap analysis.Biological Conservation, 2000, 93 ( 1 ) : 35- 41.
  • 6Oldfield T E E, Smith R J, Harrop S R, Leader-Williams N. A gap analysis of terrestrial protected areas in England and its implications for conservation policy. Biological Conservation, 2004, 120(3) : 303- 309.
  • 7Wilson K, Pressey R L, Newton A, Burgman M, Possingham H, Weston C. Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environmental Management, 2005, 35 (5) : 527- 543.
  • 8Visconti P, Pressey R L, Bode M, Segan D B. Habitat vulnerability in conservation planning-when it matters and how much. Conservation Letters, 2010, 3(6) : 404-444.
  • 9Margules C R, Pressey R L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 2000, 405 (6783) : 243-253.
  • 10Kukkala A S, Moilanen A. Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning. Biological Reviews, 2013, 88(2) : 443-464.

二级参考文献146

共引文献237

同被引文献142

引证文献10

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部