期刊文献+

3种浮游生物网对强壮箭虫捕获效率的比较研究 被引量:5

A comparison study of the capture efficiency for Sagitta crassa of three types of plankton nets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了比较大型浮游生物网(网孔505μm)、WP-2型浮游生物网(网孔200μm)和小型浮游生物网(网孔77μm)对强壮箭虫(Sagitta crassa)的捕获效率,利用2012年11月在渤海中部采集的浮游动物样品进行了分析。结果显示:小网的捕获效率最高,分别为大网的2.9倍、WP-2网的1.3倍;大网对体长9mm以下个体有明显漏采,WP-2网对体长4mm以下和部分4~5mm个体有明显漏采,小网对体长9mm以上个体的捕获效率略低于大网和WP-2网。不同网具的捕获效率与箭虫个体大小密切相关,个体越小,网具间捕获效率的差异越明显,随着体长增大,差异缩小。建议今后在强壮箭虫的繁殖季节采集小网样品,作为其他网具样品的必要补充,为毛颚动物的种群动力学研究提供更全面、准确的基础数据。 To compare the capture efficiency for Sagitta crassa (chaetognatha)of three types of plankton nets (505μm meshed coarse net,200 μm meshed WP-2 net and 77 μm meshed fine net),zooplankton samples were collected in central Bohai Sea in November,2012.The fine net outperformed the other two nets,respectively capturing 1.3 and 2.9 times the abundance of the WP-2 net and the coarse net.The coarse net apparently under-sampled less than 9mm long individuals;the WP-2 net under-sampled less than 4 mm long and a fraction of 4-5 mm long indi-viduals;while the fine net appeared to be slightly less efficient when capturing more than 9 mm long individuals. The capture efficiency was closely correlated to the body size of S.crassa:smaller body size caused greater differ-ences in capture efficiency of the nets.As for more than 9mm long individuals,avoidance of S.crassa probably ac-counted for the slightly lower capture efficiency of the fine net.We recommend that the fine net be employed for sampling S.crassa during reproduction periods to provide supplementary results to other types of nets,thus more reliable data could be obtained for future research of population dynamics.
出处 《海洋学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期141-145,共5页
基金 国家自然科学基金重大国际(地区)合作研究项目(41210008) 高校基本科研业务费专项课题(201262017)
关键词 浮游生物网 捕获效率 强壮箭虫 plankton nets capture efficiency Sagitta crassa
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wiebe P H, Benfield M C. From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography[J]. Prog Oceanogr, 2003, 56 (1) : 7-136.
  • 2王荣,张鸿雁,王克,左涛.小型桡足类在海洋生态系统中的功能作用[J].海洋与湖沼,2002,33(5):453-460. 被引量:77
  • 3Nichols J H, Thompson A B. Mesh selection of eopepodite and nauplius stages of four calanoid copepod species[J]. J Plankton Res, 1991,13 (3) : 661-671.
  • 4Hopcroft R R,Roff J C,Lomhard D. Production of tropical copepods in Kingston Harbour,Jamaica.- the importance of small species[J]. Mar Biol, 1998,130(4):593-604.
  • 5Gallienne C P,Robins D B. Is Oithona the most important copepod in the world's oceans? [J]. J Plankton Res,2001,23(12) : 1421 -1432.
  • 6Turner J T. The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs[J]. Zoological Studies, 2004,43 (2): 255- 266.
  • 7Hwang J S, Kumar R, Dahms H U, et al. Mesh size affects abundance estimates of Oithona spp. (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) [J]. Crustaeeana, 2007,80 (7) : 827-837.
  • 8Di Mauro R,Capitanio F,Vinas M D. Capture efficiency for small dominant mesozooplankters (Copepoda,Appendicularia) off Buenos Aires Prov ince (34°S-41°S) ,Argentine Sea,using two plankton mesh sizes[J]. Braz J Oeeanogr,2009,57(3) : 205-214.
  • 9Pitois S G,Shaw M,Fox C J, et al. A new fine-mesh zooplankton time series from the Dove sampling station (North Sea)[J]. J Plankton Res, 2009,31(3) : 337-343.
  • 10Riceardi N. Selectivity of plankton nets over mesozooplankton taxa: implications for abundance, biomass and diversity estimation[J]. J Limnol, 2010,69(2) : 287-296.

二级参考文献42

  • 1王荣,王克.两种浮游生物网捕获性能的现场测试[J].水产学报,2003,27(B09):98-102. 被引量:30
  • 2杨纪明,李军.渤海强壮箭虫摄食的初步研究[J].海洋科学,1995,19(6):38-42. 被引量:25
  • 3徐兆礼,王云龙,陈亚瞿,沈焕庭.长江口最大浑浊带区浮游动物的生态研究[J].中国水产科学,1995,2(1):39-48. 被引量:126
  • 4张芳,孙松,杨波.胶州湾水母类生态研究 Ⅰ.种类组成与群落特征[J].海洋与湖沼,2005,36(6):507-517. 被引量:24
  • 5郑执中,萧贻昌,1964.毛颚动物作为中国海及邻近水域海流指示种的初步探讨.中国海洋湖沼学会1963年学术年会论文摘要汇编.科学出版社,84.
  • 6Gnaiger E, 1983. Calculation of energetic and biochemical equivalents of respiratory oxygen consumption. In: Gnaiger E, Horstner H ed. Polarographic Oxygen Sensors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 337-347.
  • 7Harding J P, 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphic analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28: 141-153.
  • 8Hirota R, 1959. On the morphological variation ofSagitta crassa. Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan, 15: 191-202.
  • 9Ikeda T, 1985. Metabolic rates of epipelagic marine zooplankton as a function of body mass and temperature. Marine Biology, 85:1-11.
  • 10Mills C E, 1995. Medusae, siphonophores, and ctenophores as planktivorous predators in changing global ecosystems. ICES Journal Marine Science, 52:575-581.

共引文献130

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部