以虚假仲裁裁决书提出案外人异议的规制与对策

仲裁具有自治性、效率性、灵活性、一裁终局性的优势，但是虚假仲裁现象在现代社会不断冲击着法律的尊严和当事人的合法权利。在案外入以虚假仲裁裁决书提出案外人异议以阻挡执行程序时，法院将处于尴尬状态。法院能否对于虚假仲裁的确权裁决进行实质性审查？如果只能进行单纯程序和外观审查可能会带来哪些问题？本文将着重对此予以讨论，并对这种虚假仲裁的行为规制从解释论和立法论的角度予以分析，并提出可行性建议。

Arbitration has the autonomy, efficiency, flexibility and sex of the advantages of a ruling, but the false arbitration phenomenon in modern society constantly pounds the dignity of the law and the legal rights of the parties. On outsiders to false arbitral award, an outsider objection to block enforcement procedure, the court will be in a state of embarrassment. Can the court do substantive examination for false arbitration made by ruling？ What will happen if there only exists purely procedural and exterior review. This article will focus on discussing and explaining the false arbitration behavior regulation from the perspective of interpretative theory and legislative theory analysis, and put forward feasible suggestions.