司法审查下国内仲裁“自救”之维——以发回重新仲裁的根据为视角

我国司法审查对仲裁进行监督的方式中，包含一种仲裁机制内的纠错方式——发回重新仲裁，本文称之为仲裁“自救”。立法对重新仲裁的根据规定不明确导致实践中出现混乱，本文通过对发回重新仲裁与撤销仲裁裁决的关系界定，探究该制度的价值，并以更好地发挥其价值为标准对这种内嵌于撤销仲裁程序之下的重新仲裁进行分析，得出不属于仲裁协议的范围或者仲裁请求的范围、仲裁庭组成或仲裁程序违反法定程序、裁决所依据的证据存在缺陷等情形，应优先考虑通过重新仲裁这一仲裁内部“自救”途径解决，以最大限度保证司法对仲裁的支持。

Through the ways of judicial review for arbitration, there is a way called remanding for re-arbitration including in arbitration system to correct the wrong adjudication. This essay calls it the arbitration＇s self-help. The law has no explicit provision still, causing the confusion in judicial practice. This essay tries to definite the relationship between re-arbitration and setting aside the award and explore the value of the system to analyze how to play its value of re- arbitration under the setting aside system. This essay draws the conclusion that circumstances not within the scope of the arbitration agreement or arbitration request, the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure violation of legal procedures and the award based on flawed evidence should given preferential consideration to re-arbitrate internal arbitration by ＂ self-help＂ in order to ensure maximum support for judicial arbitration.