论选择性上诉审查机制对于仲裁协议效力的影响——兼评第21届WILLEM C.VIS国际商事仲裁辩论赛之程序问题

仲裁协议是国际商事仲裁的基石，它不仅是仲裁庭行使管辖权的前提，也会对生效仲裁裁决的承认、执行和撤销产生影响。结合第21届WILLEMC．VIS国际商事仲裁辩论赛案例争议，其涉及的“选择性上诉审查机制”值得研究。理论和实践中，除对“选择性上诉审查机制”本身的有效性存在不同观点之外，在该机制对于仲裁协议效力的影响方面亦做法不一。前者主要围绕“仲裁准据法”特定条款的解释，而后者则针对“可分性”而展开。通过梳理与比较，一方面有助于为我国仲裁实践和理论提供相应参照，另一方面，也可为法律工作者提供相应的实践路径。

Arbitration agreement is international precondition commercial arbitration. It the foundation of not only serves as of the arbitral tribunal＇s jurisdiction, also affects the the therecognition, enforcement and setting aside of the arbitral awards. This article focuses on the validity of the optional appeal and review mechanism and its effect to the arbitration agreement, which is also the procedure issue of the 21th WILLEM C. VIS International Commercial Arbitration Moot. As to the issue, concerning the interpretation over the arbitration ＂ governing law＂ as well as the ＂ severability＂, different jurisdiction has adopted various approaches in theory and practice. Through combing and comparing, it is helpful and beneficial on one hand to provide reference for the theory and practice in China and on the other hand to offer a guideline to the legal practitioners.