期刊文献+

戴震对程朱理学“道的理化”之驳斥 被引量:1

On Dai zhen Refute the Phenomenon that “Tao' Changed into ‘li'” in Neo-Confucianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 先秦汉唐以"道"为中心的哲学,在宋明时代被转换为以"理"为中心的哲学,这就是"道的理化"现象。"道的理化"倾向在社会生活中造成了许多极为消极的后果。戴震对于宋儒这种将"道"抽象化、形而上学化,视"理"为天地万物存在之最终根据的思想倾向予以批驳。在戴震看来,"理"或"天理"生发于人伦日用之中,有"道"方有"理",即有情、有欲、有事、有物方才有理。 Before Tang Dynasty, "Tao" is the center of Chinese philosophy, but in Song and Ming Dynasty, it is "li". The trend that "Tao' changed into 'li'" caused many negative consequence in social lives. Dai Zhen conducted a comprehensive and systematic theoretical liquidation for the trend of Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi who take "Tao" abstract and metaphysics. In his view, "I3" which outside in concrete thing and override in the whole concrete things is not existence. "Li" is the "code of conduct" and "moral stan- dards" of human being which established in the people's realistic life and specific relationships. "Li" represent human relations and daily expenses. The error of Neo-Confucianism is, treat "Li" as "one thing". Dai Zhen distinguished this kind of relation strictly, mastered mutually the God's way and humalities, set up an integrated manifestation of God's will outlook of materialism and set up metaphysics basis for the spread up of his morals philosophy.
作者 任万明
出处 《甘肃高师学报》 2015年第3期123-125,共3页 Journal of Gansu Normal Colleges
关键词 戴震 理学 Dai Zhen Tao Li Neo-Confucianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献48

  • 1谢遐龄.戴震哲学之二三问题[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1993,35(4):49-54. 被引量:2
  • 2段玉裁.《说文解字注》[M].,..
  • 3朱熹 黎清德编.《朱子语类》[M].[北京]中华书局,1994年版.第2375页,第2375页.
  • 4许慎.《说文解字》[M].中华书局,1960年版.第141页.
  • 5段玉裁.《说文解字注》[M].上海古籍出版社,1988年版..
  • 6.《四书章句集注》[M].上海古籍出版社,2001年版..
  • 7.《十三经注疏》[M].,.703页,708页.
  • 8.《朱子语类》[M].,.页730.
  • 9.《二程集》[M].中华书局,1981年版.第907页.
  • 10朱熹.《四书章句集注》[M].北京:中华书局,1996年版.92页.

共引文献421

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部