期刊文献+

树鼩在饲养笼中认知能力的评价试验 被引量:2

An evaluation test for the cognitive abilities of tree shrews in the home cage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了获得树鼩认知能力评估的适宜方法,通过基于洞板的食物搜寻试验,观察雄性成年树鼩对诱饵的错误选择和重复选择。结果表明:树鼩找出全部诱饵的时间均逐渐缩短,自第2天(视觉空间任务)和第4天(空间任务)起,完成任务的时间进入相对稳定期(P〉0.05)。在视觉线索有或无的情况下,树鼩错误选择次数均在第3—5天达到相对稳定(P〉0.05),说明树鼩的空间参考记忆相对稳定。在视觉空间试验中,树鼩重复选择在第2~4天达到相对稳定(P〉0.05),第5天相对显著降低;在没有视觉线索空间试验中,树鼩重复选择在第4~5天达到相对稳定(P〉0.05),提示树鼩空间工作记忆相对波动频率较大。 To obtain a suitable method for an evaluation of the cognitive abilities of tree shrews ( Tupaia belangeri), the wrong choices and re- peated choices of male adult tree shrews for baits were observed through the food searching test based on holeboard. The result showed that the time that the animals found out all the baits gradually shortened. The time to complete the task entered a relatively stable period ( P 〉 0.05 ) since the 2nd d ( visual spatial task) and the 4th d ( space task). The number of wrong choices of tree shrews reached relative stability ( P 〉 0.05 ) between 3 d and 5 d with or without visual cues, it showed that the spatial reference memory of tree shrews was relatively stable. In the visual space experiments, the repeated choices of tree shrews reached relative stability( P 〉 0.05 ) between 2 d and 4 d, and then were relatively significantly decreased at 5 d. The repeated choices of tree shrews reached relative stability ( P 〉 0.05 ) between 4 d and 5 d in the space experi- ments without visual cues, it was suggested that spatial working memory of tree shrews had greater relative volatile frequency.
出处 《黑龙江畜牧兽医》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第10期223-226,共4页 Heilongjiang Animal Science And veterinary Medicine
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAI83B02) 云南省科技厅应用基础研究联合专项项目(2012FB022)
关键词 洞板 行为 工作记忆 参考记忆 树鼩 holeboard behavior working memory reference memory tree shrew
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1HERCULANO - HOUZEL S. Coordinated sealing of cortical and cerebellar. numbers of neurons [J]. Front Neuroanat, 2010, 10 (4): 12.
  • 2KHANI A, RAINER G. Recongnition memory in tree shrew (Tupaia Belangeri) after repeated familiarization sessions [J]. Behav Processes, 2012, 90( 3) : 364 - 371.
  • 3BADDELEY A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci,2003, 4(10): 829 -839.
  • 4OLTON D S. The radial arm maze as a tool in behavioral pharmacology [J]. Physiol Behav, 1987, 40 ( 6) : 793 - 797.
  • 5OHL F, FUCHS E. Differential effects of chronic stress on memory processes in the tree shrew [J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 1999, 7(3): 379 -387.
  • 6OADES R D, ISAACSON R L. The development of food search behavior by rats: the effects of hippocampal damage and haloperidol [J]. Behav Bioi, 1978, 24( 3) : 327 - 337.
  • 7KUC K A, GREGERSEN B M, GANNON K S, et al. Holeboard discrimination learning in mice [J]. Genes Brain Behav, 2006, 5 ( 4 ) : 355 - 363.
  • 8Van der STAAY F 1. GIELING E T, PINZON N E, et al. The appetitively motivated" cognitive" holeboard , a family of complex spatial discrimination tasks for assessing learning and memory [J]. Neuros- ci Biobehav Rev, 2012, 36 ( I ) : 379 - 403.
  • 9杨文光,罗裕群,张沧人,陈培礼,张惟嘉,覃立进.中缅种树鼦脑的研究[J].广西医学院学报,1990,7(1):22-26. 被引量:3
  • 10王静,周启心,吕龙宝,徐林,杨跃雄.社会竞争失败病因学的抑郁症树鼩模型[J].Zoological Research,2012,33(1):92-98. 被引量:19

二级参考文献52

  • 1Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science,255,556 - 559.
  • 2Bartolini, L., Risaliti, R., &Pepeu, G. (1992). Effect of scopolamine and nootropic drugs on rewarded altemation in a Tmaze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav , 43 ,1161 -1164.
  • 3Berger-Sweeney, J., Steams, N. A., Murg, S. L., Floerke-Nashner, L. R. , Lappi, D. A., &Baxter, M. G. (2001). Selective immunolesions of cholinergic neurons in mice: effects on neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, and behavior. J Neurosci, 15,8164 -8173.
  • 4Cahill, J. F. X., &Baxter, M. G. (2001). Cholinergic and noncholinergic septal neurons modulate strategy selection in spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci,14 ,1856 - 1864.
  • 5Chang, Q. , &Gold, P. E. (2003). Switching memory systems during learning: Changes in patterns of brain acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum in rats. J Neurosci,23,3001 - 3005.
  • 6Hefco, V. , Yamada, K. , Hefco, A. , Hritcu, L. , Tiron, A. , & Nabeshima, T. (2004). The interaction between the cholinergic and dopaminergic system in learning and memory process in rats. Rom J Physiol,41 , 21 -30.
  • 7Hodges, H. (1996). Maze procedures: the radial-arm and water maze compared. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 3, 167 - 181.
  • 8Izquierdo, I. , Medina, J. H. , Vianna, M. R. , Izquierdo, L. A. , & Barros, D. M. (1999). Separate mechanisms for short - and long-term memory. Behav Brain Res. 103, 1 -11.
  • 9Martial van der Linden (1998). The relationships between working memory and long-term memory. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ⅲ, 321, 175 -177.
  • 10Meneses, A. (2007). Do serotonin1-7 receptors modulate short and long -term memory? Neurobiol Learn Mem87,561 -572.

共引文献39

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部