摘要
目的比较投影式红外血管成像仪引导的静脉穿刺与传统静脉穿刺的效果。方法选取住院患者360例分为干预组与对照组每组180例,干预组应用投影式红外血管成像仪引导下正向静脉穿刺法;对照组采用传统的正向静脉穿刺法,比较两组穿刺成功率、液体外漏率及完成穿刺时间。结果干预组穿刺成功率高于对照组、外漏率及穿刺时间低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论投影式红外血管成像仪引导的正向静脉穿刺法较传统静脉穿刺法安全、准确、有效。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of application of projection vein finder and traditional vein puncture. Methods Totally ,360 cases patients have been selected in our department which were randomly divided into two groups, and 180 cases in each group, the control group were given traditional positive vein puncture, intervention group were given vein puncture by projection vein finder, compared two groups of patients with the success rate of puncture, liquid leakage rate and the liquid drop speed difference. Results There was significant difference in the leakage rate and success rateof puncture between two groups of patients ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Proiection vein finder was more effective than traditional vein nuncture methad
出处
《护理管理杂志》
2015年第9期672-673,共2页
Journal of Nursing Administration
基金
甘肃省卫生厅行业科研项目(GSWST2010-17)