期刊文献+

Ⅲ期胃癌根治术后两药和三药联合化疗的疗效 被引量:1

Clinical efficacy of two-and three-drug chemotherapy schemes in treating gastric cancer at stage Ⅲ after radical resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较两药和三药联合化疗方案在Ⅲ期胃癌患者的疗效。方法Ⅲ期胃癌根治术后患者115例随机分为两组,分别实施两药联合(A组,61例)和三药联合(B组,54例)化疗,比较两组临床疗效和不良反应发生情况。结果 A组和B组3年生存率、中位无进展生存期和3年无复发率均无统计学差异(75.41%vs.74.07%、56.70个月vs.63.03个月和50.82%vs.51.85%)(P>0.05)。两组不良反应主要包括骨髓抑制、肝肾功能损伤、胃肠道反应和神经系统毒性等;A组Ⅱ-Ⅳ度贫血和乏力的发生率低于B组(14.75%vs.31.48%和27.87%vs.46.30%)(P<0.05)。结论与两药联合化疗相比,Ⅲ期胃癌根治术后三药联合化疗效果未明显改善,但不良反应有所增加。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of two- and three-drug chemotherapy schemes in treating gastric cancer at stage Ⅲ after radical resection .Methods A total of 115 patients with gastric cancer at stage Ⅲ after radical resection was randomly divided into two groups of A (treated with two-drug scheme chemotherapy ,61 cases ) and B (treated with three-drug scheme chemotherapy ,54 cases ) .The clinical outcomes and adverse effects were compared between two groups .Results The 3-year survival rate ,median disease-free survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival in group A were not statistically different from those in group B(75.41% vs .74.07% ,56.70 months vs .63.03 months and 50.82% vs .51.85% ) ( P〉0 .05 ) .The major adverse effects were myelosuppression ,injury of hepatic and renal function ,gastrointestinal reaction and toxicity of nervous system .The incidence rates of anemia of Ⅱ-Ⅳ degrees and fatigue in group A were lower than those in group B(14.75% vs .31.48% and 27.87% vs .46.30% )(P〈0 .05) .Conclusion Compared with two-drug scheme chemotherapy ,the three-drug scheme chemotherapy does not improve the clinical outcomes ,but increases chemotherapy-related adverse effects in the patients with gastric cancer at stage Ⅲ after radical resection .
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2015年第18期2151-2153,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 胃癌 辅助化疗 Gastric cancer Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献47

  • 1[1]El-Serag HB,Mason AC,Petersen N,Key CR.Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA.Gut 2002; 50:368-372
  • 2[2]Jemal A,Murray T,Ward E,Samuels A,Tiwari RC,Ghafoor A,Feuer EJ,Thun MJ.Cancer statistics,2005.CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:10-30
  • 3[3]Thun MJ,Peto R,Lopez AD,Monaco JH,Henley SJ,Heath CW Jr,Doll R.Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly U.S.adults.N Engl J Med 1997; 337:1705-1714
  • 4[4]Chen ZM,Xu Z,Collins R,Li WX,Peto R.Early health effects of the emerging tobacco epidemic in China.A 16-year prospective study.JAMA 1997; 278:1500-1504
  • 5[5]Gammon MD,Schoenberg JB,Ahsan H,Risch HA,Vaughan TL,Chow WH,Rotterdam H,West AB,Dubrow R,Stanford JL,Mayne ST,Farrow DC,Niwa S,Blot WJ,Fraumeni JF Jr.Tobacco,alcohol,and socioeconomic status and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia.J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:1277-1284
  • 6[6]Pera M,Trastek VF,Pairolero PC,Cardesa A,Allen MS,Deschamps C.Barrett's disease:pathophysiology of metaplasia and adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56:1191-1197
  • 7[7]Chow WH,Finkle WD,McLaughlin JK,Frankl H,Ziel HK,Fraumeni JF Jr.The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia.JAMA 1995; 274:474-477
  • 8[8]Lagergren J,Bergstrom R,Lindgren A,Nyren O.Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma.N Engl J Med 1999; 340:825-831
  • 9[9]Lagergren J,Bergstrom R,Nyren O.Association between body mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:883-890
  • 10[10]Graham DY,Schwartz JT,Cain GD,Gyorkey F.Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.Gastroenterology 1982; 82:228-231

共引文献17

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部