期刊文献+

准分子激光多焦点非球面切削模式治疗远视型老视术后2年临床评价 被引量:2

Clinical evaluation of biaspheric multifocal central presby LASIK treating hyperopic presbyopia 2 years postoperation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价准分子激光多焦点非球面切削模式治疗远视型老视的安全性、有效性和可预测性.方法 前瞻性自身对照研究.对36例(72眼)远视型老视患者采用飞秒激光制瓣后用准分子激光SUPRACORTM老视矫正技术矫正远视后在角膜中央区进行老视矫正,检测手术前后患者的裸眼远、近视力,屈光度,角膜形态学数据,眼压(IOP),中央角膜厚度,角膜变形指数及患者术后主观感受,术后随访24个月.计量资料正态分布采用配对t检验及重复测量方差分析,非正态分布资料手术前后比较采用Friedman秩和检验,两两比较用配对Wilcoxon符号秩和检验.结果 手术均顺利,术后24个月裸眼远视力为0.1 (0.5~-0.1)logMAR,与术前[0.2(1.0~0.0)logMAR]相比,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.59,P<0.01);术后24个月裸眼近视力为0.2 (0.8 ~-0.1) logMAR,较术前[0.55 (1.3~0.3)logMAR]提高(6.75±1.81)行,差异有统计学意义(Z=-7.14,P<0.01).术后24个月球镜度为-0.25(-1.25~+1.25)D,柱镜度为-0.24(-1.25~0.00)D,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-12.14、-3.87,P<0.01),术眼屈光度由术前的远视状态变为轻度近视漂移.术后24个月角膜中央3 mm区屈光力(43.97±1.67)D,较术前的[(43.33±1.51)D]有所提高(t=16.85,P<0.01),角膜中央5 mm屈光力及后表面屈光力与术前比较差异无统计学意义.手术前后IOP、中央角膜厚度差异无统计学意义,角膜变形指数术后大于术前(F=4.88,P<0.01),术后各时间点差异无统计学意义.术后6个月采用生活质量调查表对患者主观感受进行量化评价,得分为(80±16)分.结论 准分子激光多焦点非球面模式切削治疗远视型老视术后能提高患者远、近视力,有较好的安全性、有效性和稳定性。 Objective To evaluate safety and efficacy of SUPRACORTM technique in treating hyperopic presbyopia.Methods It was a retrospective case-series study.Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients with hyperopic presbyopia a new centered multifocal aspheric Presby LASIK, and followed 24 months postoperatively.Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), diopter, central corneal curvature, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness,corneal deformation amplitude and patient satisfaction (questionnaire) were measured.Data were analyzed using paired t test, repeat measured ANOVA, Friedman rank sum test.Results The UDVA of 24 months postoperative improved compared with preoperation [0.1 (0.5--0.1)logMAR vs.0.2(1.0-0.0)logMAR, Z=-2.59, P〈0.01].The UNVA of 24 months postoperative improved compared with preoperation [0.2(0.8--0.1)logMAR vs.0.55(1.3-0.3)logMAR, Z=-7.14, P〈0.01].The spherical dioptor and cylindrical dioptor were-0.25(-1.25-+1.25)D and-0.24(-1.25-0.00)D respectively postoperative.Mean power of the 3 mm corneal central increased (43.97±1.67 D vs.43.33±1.51 D, t=16.85, P〈0.01).Postoperative corneal deformation amplitude is greater than the preoperation (F=4.88, P〈0.01).The score of life quality questionnaire was 80±16 with at 6 months postoperation.Conclusion SUPRACORTM Presby LASIK could decrease the presbyopic symptoms and correct far distance refraction, offering spectacle-free vision in daily life in most of the treated patients.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第9期523-527,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词 老视 远视 多焦点 非球面 生物力学 激光 准分子 Presbyopia Hyperopia Asphericity Multifocal Biomechanics Lasers,excimer
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. One-year experience in presbyopia correction with biaspheric multifocal central presbyopia laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. Cornea,2013,32 (5) : 644-652.
  • 2Pinelli R, Ortiz D, Simonetto A, et al. Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paraeentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform[J]. J Refract Surg,2008,24 (5) :494-500.
  • 3Dexl AK, Jell G, Strohnmier C, et al. Long-term outcomes after monocular corneal inlay implantation for the surgical compensation of preshyopia[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2015,41 (3) :566-575.
  • 4Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El AA, et aL Refractive lens exchange [J]. Sm'v Ophthahnol, 2014,59 (6) : 579-98.
  • 5Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery [J]. J Refract Surg,2006,22 (1):19-27.
  • 6Ruiz LA, Cepeda LM, Fuentes VC. Intrastmnlal cmTection of presbyopia using a femtosecond laser system[J]. J Refract Surg, 2009,25 ( 10 ) : 847-54.
  • 7毕宏生,季鹏,王兴荣,范华,王桂敏,刘翠红.飞秒激光INTRACOR技术矫正老视[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2012,14(9):521-525. 被引量:10
  • 8毕宏生,季鹏,王兴荣,马晓华,王宝晶,王桂敏,王桂英.虹膜识别技术在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视性散光中的临床研究[J].中华眼科杂志,2007,43(4):324-328. 被引量:7
  • 9Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted LAS1K with SMILE in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism[J]. J Refract Surg, 2014,30(9) :590-596.
  • 10Elsheikh A, Abass A. Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an instrument for measurement of intraocularpressure and corneal biomechanics[J]. Curr Eye Res,2014,12: 1-9.

二级参考文献11

  • 1杜鹏,翟振武,陈卫.中国人口老龄化百年发展趋势[J].人口研究,2005,29(6):90-93. 被引量:289
  • 2Wu HK. Astigmatism and LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2002,13:250-255.
  • 3Kohnen T, Buhren J, Kuhne C, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK(with the Zyoptix 3. 1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology,2004, 111:2175-2185.
  • 4Shaikh NM, Manche EE. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 scanning-spot laser. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28:485-490.
  • 5Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal A, et al. Wavefront-and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30:398-402.
  • 6Medeiros FW, Stapleton WM, Hammel J, et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg,2007,23: 880-887.
  • 7Pepose J, Lubatschowski H. Comparing femtosecond lasers. J Cataract Refract Surg Today,2008,10:45-52.
  • 8Ruiz LA, Cepeda LM, Fuentes VC. Intrastromal correction of presbyopia with a femtosecond laser system. J Refract Surg, 2009,25 : 847-854.
  • 9Holzer MP, Mannsfeld A, Ehmer A, et al. Early outcomes of INTRACOR femtoseeond laser treatment for presbyopia. J Refract Surg,2009,25:855-861.
  • 10Ogle KN. On the problem of an international nomenclature for designating visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol,1953,36:909- 921.

共引文献15

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部