期刊文献+

循证临床决策支持的网络资源研究 被引量:1

Research on the Internet Resources for Evidence-based Clinical Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过探讨循证临床决策支持网络资源,为我国研发循证临床决策支持数据库提供理论依据。方法:系统分析循证临床决策支持的网络资源,包括BMJ Best Practice、Dyna Med Plus和Essential Evidence Plus,探讨其信息模块、提供的循证临床决策支持功能以及链接的证据资源等。结果:循证临床决策支持网络资源的主要特点是多维度的决策支持信息、一站式的证据检索平台、结构式的证据摘要、证据分级与循证临床推荐意见、同行专家参与证据分析、数据库的APP访问和远程访问。结论:建议循证临床决策支持数据库整合经过同行评审的当前最新、最佳临床研究证据,易于使用且提供解决常见临床问题的循证信息。 Objective: To investigate the internet resources for evidence-based clinical decision-making, thus providing theoretical basis for the development of evidence-based clinical decision-making resources in China. Methods: To systematically analyze the resources including BMJ Best Practice, Dyna Med Plus and Essential Evidence Plus. The information module, the evidence-based clinical decision-making support functions and the linked evidence resources were investigated. Results: The main characteristics of the evidence-based clinical decision-making resources included multi-dimension decision support information, the integrated evidence retrieving platform, the structured evidence synopsis, consideration of level of evidence and the recommendation for practice, peer-reviewed evidence, and APP as well as remote access of the database. Conclusions: The peer-reviewed, latest, and best clinical evidence are needed for the evidence-based clinical decision-making resources, and the resources should be easily access and should be able to resolve the common clinical questions.
出处 《中国数字医学》 2015年第10期17-19,35,共4页 China Digital Medicine
基金 2014年度教育部人文社科研究一般项目-新技术纳入医疗保险报销范围的循证决策支持方法研究(编号:14YJCZH035)~~
关键词 循证 决策支持 网络资源 evidence-based decision-making support the internet resources
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Schnitzbauer AA5Proneth AsPengel L,et al.Evidence-based medicine in daily surgical decision making:a survey-based comparison between the UK and Germany[J],Eur Surg Res,2015,54(1-2):14-23.
  • 2Brokel J.Evidence-based clinical decision support improves the appropriate use of antibiotics and rapid strep testing[J].Evid Based Med,2014,19(3):118.
  • 3McGinn TG,McCullagh L,Kannry J,et al.Efficacy of an evidence-based clinical decision support in primary care practices:a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Intern Med,2013,173(17):1584-1591.
  • 4Balshem H5Helfand M,Sch ii nemann HJ,et al.GRADE guidelines:3.Rating the quality of evidence[J]J Clin Epidemiolt2011,64(4):401-406.
  • 5Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence[EB/OL].http://www.cebm.net/ ocebm-levels-of-evidence.
  • 6Essential Evidence Plus.Levels of Evidence[EB/OL].http://www.essential evidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfin.
  • 7Robb MjShellenbarger T.Strategies for searching and managing evidence- based practice resources[J].J Contin Educ Nurs,2014,45(10):461-466.
  • 8苏大明,张玉燕,张华敏,李宗友,尚文玲,侯酉娟,郎朗,郝峰.循证医学主题综述知识系统UpToDate研究分析[J].中国数字医学,2013,8(10):94-97. 被引量:7

二级参考文献12

  • 1汪艳艳,贾彩莲,王伟.基于图书馆知识服务现状的模式探讨[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(S2):241-244. 被引量:4
  • 2张文举,李娜.基于知识服务的医学知识服务系统研究[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2007,16(5):1-5. 被引量:16
  • 3UpToDate[EB/OL][2013-7-8]. http:// www.uptodate.com.
  • 4Marshall JG,Sollenberger J,Easterby-Gannett S,et al.The value of library and information services in patient care:Results of a multi-site study[J].Jonrnal of the Medical Library Association,2013,101(1):38-46.
  • 5Addison J,Whitcombe J,Glover SW. How doctors make use of online,point-of-care clinical decision support systerm: a case study of UpToDate[J].Health Information & Libraries Journal, 2012,30(1):13-22.
  • 6Bonis PA,Pickens GT,tkind DM,et al. Association of a clinical knowledge support system with improved patient safety,reduced complications and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States[J].lnt J Med Infoml,2008, 77(11):745-53.
  • 7Isaac T,Zheng J,Jha A.Use of UpToDate and outcomes in US hospitals[J].J Hosp Med, 2012,7(2):85-90.
  • 8Thiele RH,Poiro NC,Scalzo DC,et al.Speed,accuracy,and confidence in Google,Ovid, PubMed,and UpToDate:results of a randomised trial [J].Postgrad MedJ,2010,86(1018):459-65.
  • 9Ahmadi SF,Faghankhani MJavanbakht A, et al.A comparison of answer retrieval through four evidence-based textbooks (ACP PIER, Essential Evidence Plus,First Consult, and UpToDate): a randomized controlled trial [J].Med Teach,2011, 33(9):724-30.
  • 10侯丽,钱庆,黄利辉,李军莲,夏光辉.基于本体的临床医学知识库系统构建探讨[J].医学信息学杂志,2011,32(4):42-47. 被引量:19

共引文献6

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部