期刊文献+

THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA

THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA
原文传递
导出
摘要 The aim of this article is to give an overview of the tasks and the function of the Supreme Court of Justice in interaction with the other two "Highest Courts'" of the Republic of Austria on the one hand, and the European Court of Human Rights as well as the Court of Justice of the European Union on the other hand. For this purpose introductory remarks will examine the Austrian understanding of the judiciary as a state power and judicial independence. The closing part of the article will particularly look into the role of the Supreme Court as highest instance in criminal matters. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the tasks and the function of the Supreme Court of Justice in interaction with the other two "Highest Courts'" of the Republic of Austria on the one hand, and the European Court of Human Rights as well as the Court of Justice of the European Union on the other hand. For this purpose introductory remarks will examine the Austrian understanding of the judiciary as a state power and judicial independence. The closing part of the article will particularly look into the role of the Supreme Court as highest instance in criminal matters.
作者 Eckart Ratz
机构地区 Eckart Ratz
出处 《Frontiers of Law in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 2015年第3期402-427,共26页 中国高等学校学术文摘·法学(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Marbury vs Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 17, 2 L.Ed. 60.
  • 2Wiederin, Die offentliche Hand als Partei und Beh6rde (The Public Authorities as Party and Authority), in Stolzleehner-FS (Celebration Publications for Stolzleehner) 741,753 (2013).
  • 3Wiederin, Die offentliche Hand als Partei und Beh6rde (The Public Authorities as Party and Authority), in Stolzleehner-FS (Celebration Publications for Stolzleehner) 754(2013).
  • 4Wiederin, Die offentliche Hand als Partei und Beh6rde (The Public Authorities as Party and Authority), in Stolzleehner-FS (Celebration Publications for Stolzleehner)fn.3 at 360 (2013).
  • 5Article 133 of the Federal Constitutional Law.
  • 6Article 144 of the Federal Constitutional Law.
  • 7Case N° 26-62, Van Gend & Loos.
  • 8Article 4 Paragraph 3 of the TEU.
  • 9the legal opinion of the Supreme Court of Justice on the relevant draft legislation for further information in this regard (in particular pages 17 ff), available at http://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXIV/SN/SN_00378/fiaame_266819.pdf.
  • 10Muller, Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Europaische Grundrechtecharta (Constitutional Jurisdiction and European Charter of Fundamental Rights), OJZ (Austrian Lawyers' Journal) 159, 165 (2012).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部