期刊文献+

国家/地区高被引论文的科学基金资助研究 被引量:9

Funded highly cited papers at countries/territories level
原文传递
导出
摘要 基金论文是科学基金资助下基础研究创新知识产出的主要载体,其中,高被引论文构成基金资助的一类代表性成果。本文使用2009—2013年收录的SCI论文为基础数据,以论文数占总数2%以上的重点国家/地区和论文数量前十的主要学科作为分析对象,对五年间16个国家/地区相应10个学科的高被引基金论文进行了实证研究,重点比较讨论基金资助现实系统中的学科差异与学科结构,结果发现:各个国家/地区的高被引论文科学基金资助率在不同学科中存在结构差异;中国与美国同属全面覆盖型资助结构。基于数据结果,本文给出了均衡式资助结构、优秀成果后资助与滚动式人才资助三项政策建议。 Funded paper occurs as the main style of funded output for basic research,and highly cited paper is a representative achievements of that.Based on the SCI indexed papers of 10 main subjects in 2009—2013,we empirically studied the difference and structure of funded papers for 16countries/territories,which have more than 2% papers in SCI.The results show that,for those major countries/territories there are significant structural differences of their funding ratios in different subjects.China as well as USA has a balance structure of funding ratios.The quantitative results of current work lead to three policy implications:balanced structure of funding,post-support of achievement and successive project of talent.
出处 《中国科学基金》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期371-377,共7页 Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目 上海市社科规划课题的部分成果
关键词 科学基金 基金资助率 高被引论文 引文分析 文献计量 science funding funding ratio highly cited paper citation analysis bibliometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献37

  • 1国家自然科学基金“十一五”发展规划[J].中国科学基金,2006,20(5):310-320. 被引量:9
  • 2Adam D. The counting house. Nature, 2002, 415 (6873): 726-729.
  • 3Moed H F. The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review. Science and Public Policy, 2007, 34 ( 8): 575-583.
  • 4Moed H F. UK research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 2008,74(1): 153-161.
  • 5Goldfarb B. The effect of government contracting on academ ic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy,2008,37(1) :41-58.
  • 6Hirseh J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS,2005,102(46) : 16 569-16 572.
  • 7Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 2005,436(7053) : 900.
  • 8Egghe L, Rousseau R. An informetric model for the Hirsch index. Scientometrics,2006,69(1) : 121-129.
  • 9Engqvist L, Frommen J G. The h-index and self-citations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008, 23(5) : 250-252.
  • 10Vanclay K. On the robustness of the h-index. JASIST,2007, 58(10) : 1547-1550.

共引文献94

同被引文献126

引证文献9

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部