摘要
基金论文是科学基金资助下基础研究创新知识产出的主要载体,其中,高被引论文构成基金资助的一类代表性成果。本文使用2009—2013年收录的SCI论文为基础数据,以论文数占总数2%以上的重点国家/地区和论文数量前十的主要学科作为分析对象,对五年间16个国家/地区相应10个学科的高被引基金论文进行了实证研究,重点比较讨论基金资助现实系统中的学科差异与学科结构,结果发现:各个国家/地区的高被引论文科学基金资助率在不同学科中存在结构差异;中国与美国同属全面覆盖型资助结构。基于数据结果,本文给出了均衡式资助结构、优秀成果后资助与滚动式人才资助三项政策建议。
Funded paper occurs as the main style of funded output for basic research,and highly cited paper is a representative achievements of that.Based on the SCI indexed papers of 10 main subjects in 2009—2013,we empirically studied the difference and structure of funded papers for 16countries/territories,which have more than 2% papers in SCI.The results show that,for those major countries/territories there are significant structural differences of their funding ratios in different subjects.China as well as USA has a balance structure of funding ratios.The quantitative results of current work lead to three policy implications:balanced structure of funding,post-support of achievement and successive project of talent.
出处
《中国科学基金》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第5期371-377,共7页
Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China
基金
教育部人文社科青年基金项目
上海市社科规划课题的部分成果
关键词
科学基金
基金资助率
高被引论文
引文分析
文献计量
science funding funding ratio highly cited paper citation analysis bibliometrics