摘要
在北宋诗坛,杨亿选择李商隐为西昆派的诗学典范;晏殊则"取少陵多";欧阳修谓韩愈为绝伦,不甚喜杜诗;而江西派又以杜甫为"诗祖"。通过杜甫由"村夫子"到"诗祖"的地位逆转,可以看到北宋诗坛诗学典范选择的利弊得失。典范选择在诗歌创作和发展中起了重要作用,但又难免一偏,可谓利弊并存,得失兼具。
Abstract: In the poetic circles of the Northern Song Dynasty, Yang Yi (杨亿) regarded Li Shangyin (李商隐) as the poetic model of Xikun School (西昆派); Yan Shu (晏殊) followed the example of Du Fu (杜甫) ; Ouyang Xiu ( 欧阳修) thought Han Yu ( 韩愈 ) unequalled, but didn' t like Du Fu' s poems very much; and Jiangxi School (江西派) considered Du Fu as the originator of poems. This article tries to discuss the pros and cons of the choice of poetic model, through the research on Du Fu' s reversed status from a village teacher to the originator of poems. And it comes to the conclusion that the choice of poetic model has played an important role in the creation and development of poems, but inevitably has its limitations. So, the choice of poetic model is a double-edged sword which has its advantages and disadvantages, as well as gains and losses.
出处
《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期25-32,共8页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
诗学典范
杜甫
杨亿
欧阳修
黄庭坚
poetic model, Du Fu (杜甫), Yang Yi (杨亿), Ouyang Xiu (欧阳修), Huang Tingjian (黄庭坚)