基于SCI的整合替代医学期刊国际影响力提升策略及中国的贡献研究

The improving strategies of SCI journals in the field of integrative complementary medicine and the contribution from China based on SCI

【目的】研究整合替代医学领域24种SCI期刊的文献计量指标,分析发展态势及中国对该领域的贡献。【方法】利用JCR统计各期刊2014年度影响因子(IF)和特征因子,利用Web of Science分析各期刊2013和2014年两年的总发文量、总被引频次、篇均被引频次、h指数等指标,分析中国对该学科领域的贡献,并研究Top100篇高被引文章的学术特征。【结果】中国整合替代医学领域3种SCI期刊近年来取得了一定的发展,且中国在国际期刊上发表的论文水平较高,中国论文在Top100高被引论文中占43%。【结论】整合替代医学是中国的优势领域,国内整合替代医学期刊的水平与中国在该领域的国际学术影响力相比仍有较大差距,中国整合替代医学期刊国际影响力有待提高,以留住国内优秀稿源。

[Purposes] This paper studies the developmental status of SCI journals in the field of of integrative complementary medicine and the contribution from China on the basis of bibliometric analysis. [ Methods ] Bibliometric analysis was performed through using the platform of Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports for the following comparisons ： （ 1 ） Impact factor and Eigenfactor Score in 2014; （2） The publication numbers, the total citations, the average citations per paper, the H index, and Chinese contribution to this field in 2013 - 2014; and （3） the characteristics of Topl00 highly cited papers in 2013 - 2014. [ Findings ]Three SCI journals of China in the field of integrative complementary medicine have obtained progress in the last 2 years; however, the quality of papers published in the international journals were high, as evidenced from that 43% of Topl00 highly cited papers was from China. [ Conclusions ] China ranks high in the field of integrative complementary medicine. However, the international impact of Chinese journals still does not match the academic influence of China in this field. The impact of Chinese journals in this field remains to improve, and thereby attracting more papers with high quality from Chinese contributors.