摘要
德里达在他的作品中很少提到柏格森,但两者之间存在着某种内在的关联。在《书写与差异》的首篇文章"力量与意义"之中,德里达借助柏格森的绵延概念,指出结构主义关注形式而忽视了力量,忽视了绵延。通过对延异和绵延两个概念的比较,可以发现德里达和柏格森有着十分接近的理论立场。德里达通过对柏格森哲学的解读和批判,尤其是对虚存概念的发展,体现了延异概念对于绵延概念的批判性推进。
Although Jacques Derrida rarely mentioned Bergson in his works, the former's theory is related to the latter's to some extent. In "Force and Signification", the first article in Writing and Difference, Derrida, with the help of Bergson's theory of duration, argues that structuralism overemphasizes form and overlooks force and duration. By comparing diff^rance and duration, it is found that Derrida's standpoint is very elose to Bergson's. Derrida's interpretation and critique of Bergson's philosophy, especially his development of the notion of the virtual, facilitates the critical advance on duration in the notion of diffdrance.
出处
《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期109-115,共7页
Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目"欧洲生命哲学的新进展"(14ZDB018)
关键词
绵延
延异
德里达
柏格森
Diff6rance, duration, J. Deirida, H. Bergson