期刊文献+

图像引导调强放疗摆位误差对老年前列腺癌患者受照剂量的影响 被引量:8

The impact of set-up errors on dose distribution during the image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in elderly patients with prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析摆位误差对肿瘤计划靶体积(PTV)及危及器官受照剂量的影响,探讨前列腺癌调强放疗中摆位误差在线校正的必要性。方法16例前列腺癌患者调强放疗中行治疗机下的锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描共214次,其图像与计划CT图像融合配准获得x、Y、z轴方向平移摆位误差。将上述误差引入治疗计划系统中重新计算得到PTV、膀胱、直肠等的剂量和体积参数并与原计划行配对t检验。结果214次摆位误差再计划的PTV95%体积剂量D95(7613.73cGy比7764.25cGy,t=2.494,P=0.025)和最小剂量Dmin(80.20±9.83比86.80±5.05,t=5.536,P〈0.001)小于原计划,但未超过可接受偏差范围。膀胱接受50Gy剂量体积(V50)和30%膀胱体积剂量(D30)以及直肠接受50Gy剂量体积(V50)和25%直肠体积剂量(D25)与原计划差异不明显。结论平移摆位误差导致PTVD95下降但可接受,膀胱、直肠总体受量变化不明显,前列腺癌放疗过程中在线误差纠正能提高治疗精确性。 Objective To analyze the impact of set-up errors on planning target volume (PTV) for tumors and radiation dose distributions, then to investigate the necessity of on-line set-up error correction for prostate cancer during IMRT. Methods Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanning images in 16 patients with prostate cancer were acquired with a total of 214 times during IMRT. The CBCT images and the original planning CT images were matched to acquire the translational errors of the x, y and z axis. The dose distributions were recalculated based on the data of each set-up error. The PTV, radiation dose distribution in organs at risk including bladder and rectum, and dose volume parameters were calculated in the re-planning, and then compared with the original planning by paired t-test. Results The PTV 95% dose volume (D95) and PTV minimal dose volume (Dmin) were lower in the re-planning than in the original planning after 214 times set-up (7613.73 cGy w 7764.25 eGy, 80. 2% w 86.8%, t=2. 494 and 5. 536, P=0. 025 or d0. 001), but it could be acceptable. Bladder received 50 Gy dose volume (V50) ,30% bladder volume dose (D30), rectume received 50 Gy dose volume (VS0) and 25% rectume volume dose (D25) in the re-planning had no statistical differences with those in the original planning. Conclusions The set-up errors lead to the decrease of PTV D95 but be acceptable. The radiation dose received by bladder and rectum has no obvious changes in the re-planning as compared with the original planning. The on-line set-up error correction for prostate cancer may improve the treatment accuracy during IMRT.
机构地区 北京医院放疗科
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1107-1110,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金 国家自然科学基金(81372415)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 放射疗法 辐射剂量 图像处理 计算机辅助 Prostatic neoplasms Radiotherapy Radiation dosage Image processing, computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy[J].Semin Radiat Oncol Biol,2G04,14 :52-64.
  • 2Hunt MA,Kutcher Dj ,Burman C,et al. The effect ofsetup uncertainties on the treatment of nasoPharynxCancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993* 27 :437-447.
  • 3Wang L. Jacob R, Chen L, et al. Stereolactic 1MR丁for prostate cancer: setup accuracy of a newstcreotaetic body localization vsystern[J]. J Appl ClinMed Phys,2004,5:18-28.
  • 4Arnaud A,Maingon I),Gauthier M, cl al. Iniagc-guided IMRT for localized prostate cancer with dailyrepositioning : inferring the difference betweenplanned dose and delivered dose distribution [ J ].Physica Med,2014,30:669-675.
  • 5Maund IF, Benson RJ,Fairfoul J, et al. Imageguided radiotherapy of the prostate using dailyCBCT : the feasibility and likely benefit ofimplementing a margin reduction[J ]. Br J Radiol,2014,87:459-462.
  • 6An Q,Ying S,Jian L,Evaluation of online/offlineimage guidance/adaptation approaches for proslatecancer radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol BiulPhys, 2015, 91:1026-1033.
  • 7徐鹭英,潘建基,王笑良,柏朋刚,李奇欣,费召东,陈传本,马礼钦,唐天兰.头颈部肿瘤图像引导调强放疗中摆位误差对剂量学的影响研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(6):506-509. 被引量:10
  • 8曹晓辉,刘明,翟福山,王安峰,杨永锋,刘兵,包超恩.用锥形束CT图像引导技术分析肺癌放疗摆位误差及其对剂量分布影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(2):163-166. 被引量:19

二级参考文献22

  • 1王鑫,胡超苏,应红梅.放射治疗中的摆位误差[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2004,11(11):1221-1225. 被引量:32
  • 2郑步宏,潘建基,徐鹭英,陈传本,张瑜,张秀春.垫内置标记点法测量鼻咽癌适形放疗摆位误差的研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(3):218-221. 被引量:19
  • 3于金明,袁双虎.图像引导放射治疗研究及其发展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):81-83. 被引量:100
  • 4戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 5Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebsque JV, et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging: review of current clinical practice. Radiather Oncol,2001,58 : 105-120.
  • 6Fu W, Yang Y, Li X, et al. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments. Phys Med Biol,2006,51:5321-5331.
  • 7Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loneol T, et al. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol, 2001.58 : 155-162.
  • 8Schubert LK, Westerly DC, Tom6 WA, et al. A comprehensive assessment by tumor site of patient setup using daily MVCT imaging from more than 3,800 helical tomotherapy treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009 ,15 :1260-1269.
  • 9Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin 0neol,2007,25:938-946.
  • 10Mechalakos JG, Hunt MA, Lee NY, et al. Using an onboard kilovoltage imager to measure setup deviation in intensity- modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys,2007 ,8 :2439.

共引文献27

同被引文献61

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部